My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35011
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:12 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:08:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/21/1987
From
CORLEY CO
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />The Corley Company <br />Pftons 63R~5050 PO. ear 1821 <br />COLORADO SPRINGS COLORADO B090t <br />Aug. 19, 1987 <br />Mr. Gregg R. Squire <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />423 Centennial Bldg. <br />1313 Sherman St. <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Squire: <br />~j <br />AU ~ 211987 <br />v11NtD ENO <br />~iECL~1M~~lON 04'J131LN <br />I asked my Daughter, Carin, to visit with you when I had not heard from my <br />letter. She said that you have made some preliminary plans to reclaim the <br />tipple area, and that you have talked with Ralph Carestia to push down the <br />banks on the area near the fire trench. <br />I am very anxious to have the tipple and fire area restored to nearly <br />original status. I am completely adverse to pushing down the banks. <br />Since you may not have sufficient funds with the small $60,000 bond to <br />accomplish much reclamation if you contract with Mr, Carestia, I would <br />like to make the following proposal. <br />The Corley Company shall complete the reclamation in Section 24 and shall <br />be paid the amount of the reclamation bond in the amount of $60,000 more <br />or less. Such reclamation by The Corley Company shall exceed that which <br />would be accomplished by other contractors for a similar amount of money. <br />Carin also said that the State has no plans to try to enforce any reclama- <br />tion for the East pit. It is my understanding that the reclamation law <br />provides for responsibility for reclamation to extend to the mining <br />company's officers in the event that the company is unable to finance the <br />reclamation. Is that correct? <br />If the State is not going to pursue any further action regarding GEC, I <br />would like for the State to give The Corley Company permission to use its <br />best efforts to accomplish reclamation itself. Specifically, I am asking <br />that The Corley Company be allowed to contract with Energy Fuels to fill <br />the pit without needing the Division's approval. If approval is required, <br />Energy Fuels may never fill the pit. I do not think that the quality of <br />work will differ with or without your approval. Energy Fuels is mainly <br />concerned with the changing personnel of the Division. I believe that <br />both the State and They Corley Company will benefit if you can agree to <br />this request. <br />r <br />Sincerely, <br />W <br />W.D. Corley, <br />President <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.