Laserfiche WebLink
• Table 23: South of Shop Block 2 Erosion Condition Classification <br /> Possible <br />Item Score 1998 1997 1996 1995 1993 <br />Soil Movement 14 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Surface Litter 14 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Surface Rock Fragments 14 0 0 0 0 2 <br />Pedestalling 14 0 0 0 0 3 <br />Flow Pattems 15 0 0 1 3 0 <br />Rills 14 0 0 0 0 6 <br />Gullies IS 0 0 4 0 0 <br />Total 100 0 0 5 3 i t <br />Erosion Condition Classi fication: Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable <br />Block 3 <br />The erosion condition composite SSF for this site was 0, which placed this area in the <br />Stable erosion class. The tabulated results for this survey aze listed in Table 24. No corrective <br />measures are planned as a result of the inventory. <br />Table 24: South of Shop Block I Erosion Condition Classification <br />• Possible <br />Item Score 1998 1997 1996 1995 1993 <br />Soil Movement 14 0 0 0 , .0 0 <br />Surface Litter 14 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Surface Rock Fragments 14 0 0 0 0 2 <br />Pedestalling 14 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Flow Pattems 15 0 0 0 3 3 <br />Rills l4 0 0 0 0 6 <br />Gullies 15 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Total 100 0 0 0 3 11 <br />Erosion Condition Classi fication: Stable Stable Stable Stable Stable <br />Concentrated Flow Feature No. 1 <br />The location of Concentrated Flow Feature No. 1 is shown on Exhibit 1, Sheet 2 of 2. <br />The feature appears to be reasonably stable with either cobble armoring or vegetation present <br />along the base and side slopes of most of the sections. The five cross-sections measured in <br />previous reports were measured again and the results are listed below. Graphical representations <br />of these measurements are found in Appendix A. The cross-sections are ordered from highest <br />upslope to lowest. <br />• Cross-section 1 Vegetation is well established on the sides and on the bottom of the <br />channel. Rock cobble on the bottom varies in size from 1" to 4" in diameter but does not <br />17 <br />