Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />t ' <br /> <br /> <br />. 1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />1 <br />~~ <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />1 9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />1~ <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />ie <br />~ l9 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />8ubaectioa (7)(L) refez• to as uciee to o+o <br />transsctions for which a r~tnra ie due after thrse ye+ar^ <br />bfore the date of filing or a transaction that oecarred. <br />during the throe ?earn iaediatsly preceding the Bats of <br />filing. <br />The elaisa of the Departaent of Labor, I be:lie~+e, <br />are snbrogated to the rights of the forcer ooal ainero, <br />surviving dependents or the potential surviving depeaiien.te. <br />Therefore, the Departaent of Labor nay not aaaert nay q:eater <br />priority than that that could b asserted by the form+~r coal ' <br />miners and their survivors. Those claias mould b en~tit.led <br />only to nasecured status bcause thoea individual >lt.a+srs are <br />not governmental gaits and, therefore, the Departseat of <br />Labor cannot aeeert any claim that ie • higher priority than <br />those from which its rights floc. <br />Though I don't blieve the Blua Diamond Coa:~ <br />f~gpany, of course, is a controlling case is this <br />jurisdiction, I blieve that the logic set forth i• <br />instructive, cad I do believe that the Bartfozd 1lccid~~, <br />Indemnity Caae, ~rhich is a ?each Circuit ogee, ie ooni:rollinq <br />oa the Coact here cad ctaade for that sage yaneral, <br />proposition. <br />Ths etatntory priorities are to b narrowly <br />conetrned, cad that ie as set forth by the'Tenth Circ~iit'a <br />Case of case of Isaac v. Temex Enezw. <br />31 <br />