Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />i <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4' <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />e <br />9 <br />30 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />13 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />Z1 <br />Z2 <br />23 <br />Z~ <br />25 <br />lat. 1a1TERN11Ht osry bristly, lour eonor. I weld <br />indicate that the Dnsscured Creditors' Committee aovecl to <br />intervene as a party plaintiff is this action sad have <br />received wzd that ionr loaor saaentad that order as Mloadny <br />of thi• mock sad it eras aatued yesterday. iscanss o!' that, <br />ao response has been tiled by the Committee, althon~~h the <br />Committee joins in the position of the Debtors. <br />The Committee's concern in this ease is t~~ aoaitor <br />claims sad to assure thst creditor ue only given priority <br />that ue entitled to priority. <br />The claims asserted by the Departs-ent of ]i.abor for <br />priority are similar to those, as ![s. teaks has atai:ed, <br />similar to those asserted by the PBGC. ]lad although the <br />collection aechaaism is patterned after the effiefa~t <br />sechanism •stablishsd for the Internal Rsvenns rervj~ce, that <br />does not give rise to their claims bsiaq tar elaias.. <br />?or those reasons, the Cowittee would jots .in the <br />ugumeat and mould ask this Court to deny nay pziori.ty status <br />to those claims. <br />T88 COUltTt ? bask yon, llr. Natarsiaa. . <br />Ire thers nay other parties who wish to ap~aalk in <br />anpport of the Dsbtors• action for snamary jndgaeat4 <br />?he parties uquiaq is oppositiomT rir. atab:ler. <br />lat. ST118LERs ?hank you. I will 'try to be brief. <br />I know the Court bas a tairly toll schedule. <br />