My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34738
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34738
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:03 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:01:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/3/1999
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR PR2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This projection exceeds the Division's suspect level for material damage for <br />water used to irrigate hay crops. SCC estimated production losses resulting from <br />the increase in salinity. Based on the information provided by SCC, the Division <br />finds that no material damage will occur. See Section B.XII of this document for <br />additional details. <br />Dry Creek <br />5CC projects impacts from all spoil springs will increase TDS in Dry Creek from <br />1,048 mg/1 to 2,463 mg/l. The TDS increase extends from Hubberson Gulch to <br />the Dry Creek reach monitored by Station WSDS (upstream of the fields irrigated <br />from Temple Reservoir #1). At this point, the baseline TDS level in Dry Creek <br />begins to increase downstream. At a downstream location in Dry Creek, the <br />TDS concentrations are elevated enough (TDS = 3,567 mg/1) that the cumulative <br />spoil discharge influences from both mining areas (Seneca II-W and Seneca II-W <br />South) will be minimal. The source of the salt loading to Dry Creek is <br />principally seepage from dry land farming that extends from the hillslopes at the <br />base of the mountains to Hayden. Dry Creek water is mixed with water from the <br />J.C. Temple Reservoir #1 for irrigation in fields below this reservoir. The <br />Division fmds that there will be no material damage to water in Dry Creek since <br />the background TDS levels are higher than the projected TDS levels from <br />Hubberson Gulch. <br />IV. Topsoil <br />Soil resource information is provided in Tab 9, Volume 5 of the permit application. <br />Information on topsoil handling, maintenance and testing is contained in Tab 21, Volume <br />13. The PR-1 submittal extensively reorganized the soils sections of the application and <br />updated the soil baseline information to reflect 1990 survey of portions of the north mine <br />area which had not previously been surveyed. Baseline data had been collected for the <br />South Extension Area covered in PR-2, but in 1997 SCC conducted a topsoil depth <br />verification survey to confirm the topsoil resource information collected previously. This <br />information is also included in Tab 9. <br />The permit area is occupied by three soil orders; Mollisols, Entisols, and Aridisols. The <br />presence of these three orders is characteristic of the soils found in steep, semi-arid <br />regions of Northwestern Colorado. These orders represent soils that grade from recently <br />developed soils with minimum horizon development to more developed soils with well <br />developed diagnostic horizons. Specific soil types within these orders occur on <br />predominantly three types of parent material-land form combinations, namely: 1) upper <br />side slopes, ridges, and swales of sandstone residuum; 2) toe slopes, side slopes, rounded <br />ridge tops of shale residuum and colluvium; and 3) toe slopes, side slopes, ridges, and <br />escarpments of sandstone and shale. Among the 22 soil types occurring within the permit <br />Seneca II-W Findings Documen[ 32 November 3, 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.