My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34738
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34738
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:03 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:01:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/3/1999
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR PR2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
parameters will decrease with time as the readily dissolvable elements are leached <br />until an equilibrium level is reached. Further discussion of this is found under the <br />Surface Water Effects of the Probable Hydrologic Consequences section. <br />Surface Water Effects <br />The majority of runoff from disturbed aeeas during the mine life will be diverted to <br />Sediment Ponds 005 and 006, prior to release off site. Effluent from Ponds 005 and <br />006 flows to unnamed ephemeral gulches, and ultimately Dry Creek. Runoff from <br />the south extension area will flow into Hubberson Gulch, and ultimately Dry Creek. <br />Effects of mining on Dry Creek will involve changes in quantity and quality, which <br />are further described below. <br />A negligible acreage affected by the extreme eastern extension of the south area pits <br />and the neck pits between the north and south mining areas will drain to Sediment <br />Ponds 009 and 015, and eventually to Sage Creek. Measurable effects on Sage <br />Creek water quality or quantity are not projected, due to the small disturbance <br />acreage and the fact that there will be no spoil water flow to the Sage Creek <br />watershed. <br />The mining and reclamation activities will act to change stream channel <br />geomorphology. Drainage densities and channel frequencies will be reduced; <br />however, Seneca Coal Company has designed and located post-mining drainage <br />channels to minimize the erosive results of the lowered frequencies. <br />During mining operations and until adequate vegetation is established, runoff and <br />erosion rates within the disturbed azea will be higher than pre-mining rates. Seneca <br />Coal Company calculated runoff and erosion sediment yield rates from disturbed <br />areas when designing all sediment ponds. (Tab 13). Sediment leaving the site will <br />be controlled to meet effluent limits placed upon sediment pond dischazges in Seneca <br />Coal Company's Colorado Discharge Permit System permit. Baseline flows in <br />Hubberson Gulch exhibit TSS levels from 5 mg/1 to 606 mg/1 with an average of 100 <br />mg/1. The total suspended solids increase to Hubberson Gulch that can be attributed <br />to mining is expected to be minimal. Once vegetation is successfully reestablished, <br />the erosion rates aze expected to return to the pre-mining level of approximately 140 <br />tons/mi'-/yr. <br />Sediment ponds will act to control flood flows from the disturbed azea. The ponds <br />will regulate flood discharges, minimizing the impact of the floods. The ponds aze <br />not expected to significantly reduce the quantity of runoff water available in Dry <br />Creek. The mine area makes up only a small portion of the Dry Creek watershed <br />(0.9 %). <br />Seneca II-W Findings Document 30 November 3, 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.