My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34599
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:59 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:59:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/4/1987
Doc Name
1986 PROGRESS REPORT CYCC ASPEN REGENERATION STUDY PN C-81-071 LITTLE MIDDLE CREEK TRACT
From
YAMPA VALLEY COAL CO
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ASPEN REGENERATION STUDY <br />(1986 PROGRESS REPCRT) <br />INTRODUCTION: <br />~~~EOV~~ <br />~dAY 0¢ 1967 <br />MINED LANb <br />CIECLAMATION DIVISION <br />This report contains the first years results of Colorado Yampa Coal <br />Company's (CYCC) Aspen regeneration study. <br />As part of CYCC's wildlife mitigation plan for the Little Middle Creek <br />Tract (LMCT) they are conducting a study to test several treatments with <br />potential for improving Aspen establishment and survival on livehandled <br />topsoil. Aspen is the dominate vegetation type on the LMCT. Previous <br />studies and monitoring conducted at CYCC have shown that live-handed <br />topsoil without any additional seeding is a valuable technique for improving <br />native plant establishment, particularly shrubs. Shrub densities on <br />live-handled sites have proven superior to those on seeded sites. Aspen is <br />initially one of the woody species that sprouts on live-handled sites. <br />However, aspen does not persist as well as many of the other shrub species. <br />Observations, and discussions with USFS Aspen experts indicate a number of <br />potential problems. The factors which seem most likely for the decline of <br />aspen on live-handle sites are browsing by big game, root size of aspen in <br />live-handled topsoil and moisture. <br />Browsing by deer and elk on CYCC reclamation occurs through out the <br />summer and is particularly heavy during spring and fall. Extensive elk <br />studies/tee at CYCC show that 150-200 elk use the mine during the summer <br />and as (nAy) as 1000 elk migrate across the mine spring and fall. Although <br />extensiv study has not been done on deer, they are a common sight on <br />reclamation throughout the summer. Small aspen seedlings sprouting from <br />chopped root segments in live-handled topsoil do not have estab]ished root <br />systems. As a result any amount of browsing can exhaust the remaining <br />carbohydrate reserves for resprouting and establishment. <br />Average annual precipitation on the LMCT is between 16 and 20 inches. <br />This is the low end for aspen habitats. As a result desication of young <br />seedlings could be a major cause of aspen mortality Browsing and <br />competition from grasses (which are very productive on live-handled sites) <br />could be contributing to the water stress for the seedlings. <br />Taking into account the above information, several treatments were <br />designed to test their effectiveness on improving aspen survival on <br />live-handled topsoil. Most of CYCC's live-handled toy sail is currently <br />treated with a Madge-Rotoclear prior to moving the topsoi Y This machine is <br />pulled by a dozer which knocks down the trees and existing vegetation which <br />are then chopped up by the Mad e-rotoclear and incorporated into the <br />topsoil. This has been very eff~tive in providing a natural mulch and <br />incorporating organic matter that-other wis be removed and lost. However, <br />it was felt that the Madge-rotocleal-' ma be reducing the size of root <br />seg ents in live-handled topsoil. As a res lt, poor sprouting or survival <br />maybe occurring. There is evidence that increased disturbance to aspen <br />roots reduces sprouting. Therefore, one treatment consisted of comparing <br />rotocleared topsoil with topsoil which has not been rotocleared. <br />Non-rotocleared topsoil would have the trees dozed off and then would be <br />live-handled. <br />Another treatment consisted of moving topsoil in 1 li~'t verses 2 <br />lifts. When 2 lifts are used the top 16 to 18 inches for rotocleared sites <br />and 10 to 12 inches for dozed sites are removed seperately from the <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.