My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34438
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34438
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:55 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:56:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/29/1994
Doc Name
FAX COVER SHEET WEST ELK MINE PN C-80-007 BRUSH DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES
From
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
To
MLR
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mountain Coal Company <br />Weal Elk Mine <br />Post Office Box 591 <br />Somerset, Colorado 81434 <br />Teleplane 303 95015 <br />Fax 303949-5695 <br />August 25, 1994 <br />Ms. Christine E. Johnston <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br />] 313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />R>`C~IVEp` <br />III llll«Illll«!11 <br />AUK 29 <br />Ca`sron o; nure;als a 4nalo`'S' <br />Re: West Elk Mine, Permit No. C-80-007, Brush Disposal Alternatives <br />Dear Christine: <br />After receiving contractors' cost estimates ranging from about $50,000.00 to $110,000.00 for the <br />disposal of brush from the Materials Storage Bench area at the Delta County landfill, Mountain <br />Coal Company (MCC) began considering other alternatives for brush disposal. Included in this <br />consideration were using achipper/shredder to break the oakbrush into small pieces for mulch or <br />incorporation in the topsoil stockpile, stockpiling the brush nearby for later burning or for <br />redistribution on the seeded topsoil stockpile (for small game cover and/or seedling shade), or <br />"brush-crushing" the entire area first, breaking the material with the bulldozer tracks, and <br />incorporating the vegetative debris in the topsoil stockpile. Unbroken stems greater than about <br />three inches in diameter would be stored nearby and later scattered on the seeded topsoil <br />stockpile. <br />We understand that the Delta County landfill has less than two years of projected life remaining <br />and is only accepting limited amounts of vegetative wastes. Considering this, it is unlikely that <br />they will accept the amount of unconsolidated blush that will be removed from the construction <br />site (thus, the high disposal costs). Oakbrush wood is dense and would be dirt-covered after <br />removal from the site, making it undesirable for chipping, as the blades of a commercial <br />chipper/shredder would be quickly dulled or ruined. Burning. is a viable option, but with the <br />current burning ban, may not be completed for some time. <br />MCC believes that the only feasible alternatives are to temporarily stockpile the brush for later <br />redistribution over the seeded topsoil stockpile or to brush-crush the area first, redistributing only <br />the unbroken, lazger diameter stems over the seeded topsoil stockpile <br />° D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.