My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34324
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34324
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:51 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:54:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999034
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/9/1999
Doc Name
PERMIT M-99-034 COOLEY RESERVOIR & FULTON WILDLIFE AREA PIT REVISED EXHIBITS
From
ADCO CONSULTING
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
l~'. <br /> <br />i <br />~~TATE OF COLORADO <br />Bill Owens, Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />DIVISION OF WILDLIFE <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER <br />John W. Mumma, Director <br />6060 Broadway <br />Denver, Colorado 80216 <br />Telephone: (303) 297-1192 <br />May 17, 1999 <br />Carl Mount <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman St. Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br /> <br />RAC'-.: r _. <br />!_ ! t/` r <br />MAY 18 1999 <br />~%5; <br />RE: Permit # M-99-034 -CAMAS Colorado -Cooley Reservoir/Fulton Wildlife Area <br />Dear Mr. Mount: <br />C.~~~O <br />b <br />For Wi(d!'ifr - <br />For Ptople <br />I have reviewed this new application with Disfid Wildlife Manager Obe Lowry and am familiar <br />with the site from past visits during an earlier comment phase. The comments we made earlier, <br />which were included with this application, are still valid as the proposal is essentially identigl to <br />the previous plan. A few additional points: <br />The setback distance from the South Platte River is a signific~rlt factor. If mining is kept <br />back 400' as is currently proposed, the impacts from the planned work should easily be <br />mitigated for by the wetland creation project on the east side of the river. If coser <br />encroachment occurs, there will be significant removal of trees from the riparian conidor <br />along the west river bank In that event, we would suggest additional mitigating measures - <br />planting of native cottonwvodshvillows in the remaining riparian zone and removal of <br />livestock grazing in the riparian zone. <br />The plan for the wetland in Parcel B is confusing. One part of the application indicates that <br />no open water will result, but one of the maps clearly shows an open water area. We feel <br />that the wetland would be more valuable to wildlife with an open water component. Since <br />some open water in the current wetland will be lost, we suggest that at least an equal <br />amount of open water be replaced. <br />The wildlife section slightly overstates the value of the new reservoirs to waterfowl, but this is <br />not a significant point. <br />The plan to leave the trees at the south end of Parcel A is excellent! <br />Please let me know if you have any questions. <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Greg Watcher, Executive Director <br />WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Chuck Lewis. Chairman • Mark LeValley, Vice Chairman • Bernard L. Black, Jr., Secretary <br />Dorothea Farris, Member • Philip James, Member • Arnold Salazar, Member • John Singletary, Member <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.