My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34269
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34269
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:50 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:53:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/8/1996
Doc Name
CRESSON PROJECT PN M-80-244 QUESTIONS REGARDING STATUS OF CRESSON MINE HIGHWALL STABILITY AND ADDITI
From
CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINING CO
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />4. Ground-water investigation. To investigate the finding that the highwall rock is not <br />saturated, and that no water pressure exists within the highwalls, two holes were drilled <br />into the highwall. The holes were inclined at 45°, which oriented the hole perpendicular <br />to the highwall. The holes were 750 feet long. One week after completion, one hole <br />was dry and the other had 70 feet of water at the base of the hole. The zone of <br />saturation indicated by the water that was encountered is located well outside of any <br />highwall failure surface. <br />Based on these observations, it is evident that the ground-water pressure in the Mine highwalls <br />is zero. The drained rock masses are believed to be the result of the continuing function of the <br />underlying network of drainage tunnels connected to the underground mine workings, and by <br />the relatively porous nature of the underlying strata. <br />Summary of Rock Conditions at the Cresson Mute <br />These continuing observations have confirmed that the Cresson Mine highwalls are comprised <br />of the "hard, competent rock (Uniaxial compressive strengths in the range of 5500 to 28000 <br />psi)" that was projected in the application for permit amendment Number 6 (see statement in <br />Enclosure 19 of Volume VIII of CC&V's Permit Amendment Application -prepared by Call & <br />Nicholas, Inc. in report dated 23 February 1994). The jointing. which has been encountered <br />during mining, has fewer significant join[ sets than was projected in [hat application, and the <br />rock has been found to be unsaturated and experiencing no hydrostatic head. <br />Slope Design <br />Original design <br />The original mine slope design projected the following: <br />1. Mined slope. Each mined bench was designed to be 20 feet high. The interbench <br />slope (the ou[slope of the 20-foot bench) was recommended to be 72°. A 2-foot offset <br />was planned above each 20-foot bench. <br />2. Catch benches. Catch benches were planned to occur every 4th level (resulting in <br />80-foot total height between catch benches. The catch-bench width was planned to be <br />between 31 and 48 feet, with the difference a function of the orientation of the Mine <br />highwall relative to the fractures and joints. <br />3. Overall slope. The total offset between catch benches was between 37 and 52 feet. <br />This, combined with the 72° interbench slope and the variable catch bench width, <br />provides a range in overall highwall slope angles from 48 to 52°. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.