My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34245
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:49 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:52:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984063
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/1/1991
Doc Name
EASTSIDE MINE FILE C-84-063
From
MLRD
To
GARFIELD CITIZENS ALLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iiiiiiiiiiiiinnii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />7313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FAx: 303 632-8106 <br />February 1, 1991 <br />Mr. John Spangler <br />Garfield Citizens' Alliance <br />Box 111 <br />Silt, CO 81652 <br />Re: Eastside Mine - File No. C-84-063 <br />Dear Mr. Spangler: <br />OF ~~[p <br />~~`~;$ <br />. ~ . <br />t <br />~e76 { <br />Rq Romer. <br />Governor <br />Fred R. Banta. <br />Division Dueclor <br />This letter is in response to your letter of January 7, 1991, in which you <br />outlined a number of concerns the Garfield Citizens' Alliance has with the <br />Eastside Mine. We have addressed each of the items of concern separately, <br />below. <br />Item 1. - Status of Garfield County Special Use Permit <br />Based on a telephone conversation with Mr. Mark Bean of the Garfield County <br />Planning Department, as well as discussion with Mr. Steve Self of Eastside <br />Coal Company, our understanding of the county permit status is as follows. <br />A county Special Use Permit for the Eastside Mine was never actually issued, <br />although a conditional Resolution of Approval was issued by the Garfield <br />County Commissioners on March 18, 1985. Garfield County has taken the <br />position that the Resolution of Approval constituted a defacto Special Use <br />Permit, which would have expired March 18, 1990. Eastside Coal Company <br />(Eastsidel has contested this determination, contending that the Special Use <br />Permit was never issued and that operations to date have been conducted as a <br />"pre-existing non-conforming use." Both Garfield County and Eastside agree <br />that there presently is no Special Use Permit in effect for the Eastside Mine <br />and Mr. Self has indicated that Eastside intends to apply fora new Special <br />Use Permit. <br />Mr. Bean has indicated that Eastside has every right to apply fora new <br />Special Use Permit and that the county has imposed no specific time <br />limitations on Eastside to either apply for and obtain a Special Use Permit or <br />initiate reclamation. Eastside may have the authority to operate the mine on <br />a very limited basis as a "pre-existing non-conforming use" but the county has <br />not made a final decision on this matter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.