My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34195
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34195
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:48 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:52:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/26/1987
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN1
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Eckman Park and dine 1, and underground discharge from the adjacent Foidel <br />Creek i4ine nos converted Foidei Creek from an intermittent stream to a <br />perennial stream. .Additional spoil aquifer discharge would result from <br />further mining in Eckman Park and the LMC tract and thus the quantity of water <br />ultimately supplied to the Trout creek AVF would be increased by a small <br />amount. <br />As discussed previously, however, the elevated salinity of the spoil aquifer <br />discharge and TCC underground mine discharge raises the concern of material <br />damage due to salt loading, <br />Rule 2.06,8(5)(b) of the Colorado Regulations specifically refers to potential <br />increases in electro-conductivity of water supplying AVFs to levels above the <br />threshold value at which crop yields decrease as constituting material <br />damage. The rule further cites a specific paper by E. V, 19aas and G.J, Hoffman <br />of the U.S. Salinity Laboratory published in the Journal of the Irrigation and <br />Drainage Diversion, ASCE., June, 1977. <br />In their paper, Maas and Hoffman list research derived salinity threshold <br />levels and response rates for selected agricultural species and group those <br />species as well as a number of additional crops into four categories based on <br />relative tolerance to salinity (sensitive, moderately sensitive, moderately <br />tolerant and tolerant). <br />The Division has taken the approach that a positive material damage finding <br />would be made if projected salinity increases resulting from mining would <br />result in significant decreases in production or shifts in species composition <br />based on the Maas and Hoffman paper. <br />On the Trout Creek AVF, TCC sampled vegetative cover within a number of farmed <br />fields as denoted on Supplemental Map No. 36, Vegetative production, as well <br />as cover was sampled in one field, Pasture 11. A majority of the species on <br />the AVF would be considered moderately tolerant, and on an acreage weighted <br />basis only 18.4A of the cover was made up of moderately sensitive species <br />(salinity threshold reached at root zone soil saturated paste extract <br />electro-conductivity of 1,5 mmhos/cm), A number of the species encountered <br />have not been ranked by Maas and Hoffman, and other references were <br />consulted. In general, Aveneae tribe grasses and Trifolium species were <br />considered to be moderately sensitive, while Triticeae, tipeae, and Poeae <br />tribe grasses (with the exception of Dactylis) were considered to be <br />moderately tolerant. Carex and Juncus spec es were also considered to be <br />moderately tolerant. <br />As shown in Table 13 of this document, projected Trout Creek water quality for <br />flood irrigation is approximately .5 mmhos/cm. Assuming that a root zone <br />saturated extract soil salinity of .75 mmhos/cm would result from flood <br />irrigation water with a specific conductance of .5 mmhos/cm, no decrease in <br />crop production would occur, The assumed relationship between irrigation <br />water salinity and root zone soil salinity is within the typical range <br />reported in USDA Handbook 60, based on leaching calculations included in the <br />application and soil sampling conducted on the Fish Creek AVF by the Division, <br />the 1,5:1 relationship is considered conservative. No decrease in production <br />of any of the species currently grown on the Trout Creek AVF would be expected <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.