My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34011
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:41 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:47:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/13/1987
Doc Name
PEABODY COAL CO SENECA II MINE ALFALFA MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL PLAN PN C-80-005
From
MLRD
To
STEVE RENNER
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />DATE: May 13, 1987 <br />T0: Steve Renner (~~~ <br />FROM: Peter O'Connor \~' <br />RE: PEABODY COAL COMPANY - SENECA II MINE - ALFALFA MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL <br />PLAN - PERMIT N0. C-80-005 <br />As requested, I have reviewed the above referenced plan submitted by Peabody <br />Coal Company (PCC) on April 12, 1987. This plan was submitted to resolve a <br />commitment made by PCC during permit renewal as addressed on pages 24 and 25 <br />of PCC's August 29, 1986 PAR reply letter and on page 34 of the <br />December 31, 1986 Findings Document (Section XII - Vegetation). Due to delays <br />encountered by PCC, the Division agreed to extend the submittal date from <br />February 1, 1987 to April 15, 1987. <br />The plan submitted by PCC specifically addresses attempting to control the <br />alfalfa infestation problem at Seneca II by grazing. PCC proposes fencing off <br />303 acres of reclaimed area which will be grazed by either cattle or sheep. <br />Initial animal stocking rate will be set so that animal utilization will be <br />approximatey 75%. (Typical stocking rate is around 50% forage utilization; <br />the higher rate is "...to insure that desired impacts to the alfalfa component <br />and the overall vegetation stand can begin to be realized.") Grazing will be <br />anywhere from mid-May through late-October. Grazing in future years will be <br />at approximately 50% forage utilization. <br />Based on mY review, I have a number of concerns as addressed below. <br />1. The August 1986 PAR reponse letter addressed a two-fold management <br />plan: short-term goals of eradication or significant reduction of the <br />alfalfa population; and long-term control and management of the <br />remaining stands. As noted on page 25, "Eradication or significant <br />reduction of the alfalfa stands over the short term can best be <br />accomplished by application of a selective broadleaf herbicide which <br />will allow for survival of graminoids in the stand. While some fortis <br />and shrubs will also be lost, it is anticipated that the extensive <br />alfalfa canopies will intercept much of the spray, thus shielding to <br />some degree more desireable broadleaf plants." The long-term control <br />and management would be accomplished by a grazing management plan. <br />The Division agreed to the concept of the two-fold management plan <br />because of the flexibility it provided to PCC. There are no <br />certainties that grazing only, herbicide only, or one management <br />technique only will be able to control the alfalfa problem. The <br />presented two-fold plan allowed for variability in attempting to <br />resolve the infestation problem. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.