Laserfiche WebLink
ROY ROMER <br />Governor <br /> <br />III~II~II~II~III~ • <br />~~~' o <br />,'~ ~ ~` <br />• '~' w <br />* 1876 s <br />OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER <br />DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES <br />7313 Sherman Street-Room 818 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />(303)866-3581 <br />FAX [303] 866-3589 <br />May 20, 1992 <br />IJIr. Alan Leak <br />WRC Engineering, Inc. <br />1660 S. Albion Street, Suite 500 <br />Denver, CO 80222 <br />RE: Valco Inc.'s Substitute Water Supply Plans <br />MI.RD M77559, M77560, M77572, M77573, M8400~and M86015 <br />Water D;'vision 2 <br />Deaz Alan: <br />The State Engineer's Office is in receipt of your February 14, 1992 le <br />clarification of Senate Bill 120's (SB 120) grandfather date in regards to the evapor; <br />on pre-1981 surface acres. We offer the following comments in response to your <br />iAL) D. SAMSON <br />State Engineer <br />requesting <br />depletions <br />SB 120 allows an exemption from the priority system of depletions sociated with <br />evaporation from pre-1981 exposed ground water surface acres resulting from gravel mining <br />operations. Your specific question is "...does SB 120 allow the exposed waters ace azea to be <br />moved around within the given pit with augmentation being required only for xposed water <br />surface azea in excess of the pre-1981 water surface azea?" <br />Section 37-90-137 11(b), C.RS. provides in part that "...no such well p rmit, plan for <br />augmentation or plan of substitute supply shall be required to replace d letions from <br />evaporation...". You azgue that the intent of this statute was to grandfather d pletions. The <br />exposed azea is a method of defining the grandfathered depletions. <br />A continuous mi-ting operation within the specified reclamation permit ea which had <br />established a pond azea as of January 1, 1981, may continue mining operatio within that <br />permitted azea without the need of a well permit nor a plan of augmentation for t amount of <br />associated consumptive use by evaporation, provided there is no deactivation of th operation and <br />the total resultant exposure of ground water within the permitted area does not xceed the azea <br />of exposure as of January 1, 1981. <br />The burden of proof remains with the applicant to accurately document the p e-1981 ground <br />water surface acreage. It is also the responsibility of the applicant to strictly regulat the post-1981 <br />surface acres and submit reports of appropriate data. <br />