GENERAL33643 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

exception to the statutorily unqualified power of abandonment. See, In re Paolella, 79 B.R. fi07; 610 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987); !n re Purco, 76 B.R. 523, 533 (Banta. W.D. Pa. ]987). In Midlantic the Supreme Court established an exception to abandonment under § 554(a) where abandonment would be in "direct contravention of state and local laws designed to protect public health and safety." Id. at 762. Before state environmental laws can operate to restrict the otherwise unfettered abandonment power under § 554(a), "imminent and identifiable harm" to the public health or safety must be shown. Midlantic, 474 U.S. at 507, n. 9." Since Midlantic, courts have struggled with balancing a debtor's need to abandon property with the need to protect the public health and safety. In In Re Franklin Signal Corp., 65 B.R. 268 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1986), the court developed guidelines to determine under what conditions a bankruptcy court may approve abandonment of property in contravention of state law. The court rejected a strict interpretation of Midlandc by holding that a trustee's power of abandonment of property in contravention of state law is not restricted if conditions are formulated that will adequately protect the public health and safety. Id. at 271; see also, In re Oklahoma Refining Co., 63 B.R. 562 (Banta. W.D. Okla. 1986). Although conditions for abandonment must be ° 'iLe bankruptry trustee in Midlands requested court approval to abaadoa two waste oil processing fadlities that had accepted a substantial quantity of oil contaminated with PCBs. 'ILe estimated cost o[ cleaning-up and removing the contaminated oil substantially exceeded the value of the two sites to the estate, thus presenting a net burden to the estate. Abandonment would have been in direct contravention of state and lonl laws, nevertheless, the trustee moved to abaadoa the facilities as a burden to the estate. 'I3e Supreme Court denied the motion to abaadoa, stating that abandonment of the properties would be in wntraventioa of state or lonl laws designed to protect public health and safety. Midlanric clearly indicated that the waste oil facilities posed a very serious threat to the public TLe facilities contained approximately 470,000 gallons o[ oil contaminated with highly toxic, nrcinogenic PC& in unguarded and deteriorating containers. Id at 497.