My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL33541
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL33541
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:28 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:39:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/10/1982
Doc Name
HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS OF THE AS BUILT RESTORED NEWLIN CREEK CHANNEL
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~1 <br />filter and clay zone as specified in the design in the main channel with the <br />rock size range from 1 foot to 3 feet in diameter. The pit at both sides of <br />the restored channel has not been reclaimed by Dorchester; therefore, there <br />~ was no riprap placed at the overbank area at the time of the site visit. <br />1 <br />III. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br />The hydraulic calculation of the designed channel was presented in the <br />September 1981 report (Table 20, p. 74 ). The as-built channel cross section <br />' is shown in Figure 2. The channel dimensions were obtained using the measured <br />dimension and 3-feet riprap was added on top of the gravel filter. Since the <br />' channel slope varies from 3 to 4 percent, a slope of 3 percent is used in <br />these hydraulic calculations. Table 1 presents the dimensions and results of <br />the hydraulic calculations for the designed channel and as-built channel. <br />' Table 1 indicates that the as-built channel is narrower and deeper than the <br />' designed channel. However, the capacity of the as-built channel is greater <br />' than the designed channel. <br />The 100-year, 24-hour peak runoff (9789 cfs) was also used to check the <br />hydraulic characteristics of the as-built channel. An overbank slope of 10 to <br />1 was assumed since the pit has not been totally reclaimed. The overbank area <br />' would have flow depth of 3 feet during a 100-year, 24-hour peak runoff. The <br />floodplain will be approximately 123 feet wide. Atypical cross section of <br />the completely restored Newlin Creek channel is shown in Figure 3. The <br />results of the hydraulic calculations are given in Table 2. <br />' IV. CHANNEL STABILITY <br />The velocities in the as-built channel range from 13 fps to 17 fps for <br />' the peak runoffs of the 10-year, 24-hour and 100-year, 24-hour events. Riprap <br />protectiong at channel bottom and banks is required. For side slope of 2.3 <br />' to 1, riprap with a mean diameter of 1.5 feet is adequate for both channel <br />bottom and banks. The thickness of riprap should be approximately 3 feet. <br />The as-built channel has approximately 3-foot thick riprap with the mean <br />diameter approximately 1.5 feet. The as-built channel also has gravel filter <br />below the riprap to prevent the loss of fine particles and clay liner under <br />' the gravel filter to prevent seepage. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.