My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-01-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981022
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981022
>
2003-01-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2020 7:30:15 AM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:38:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/27/2003
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR5
From
Elk Creek Mine & Federal Lease Modification
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Creek yazd. The West Valley Fill coal refuse azea was permitted through Technical Revision No. <br />29 for use when the East Yard waste pile was filled to capacity. The operator began using the <br />West Valley Fill coal refuse azea during the third quarter of 2000. Non-combustible mine <br />development waste will be disposed of underground in finished C-seam mine workings in a <br />fashion approved by the Mine Safety and Health Administration. <br />On January 26, 1999, Oxbow Mining evacuated the Sanbom Creek Mine due to elevated levels <br />of cazbon monoxide. The concern was that the elevated levels may have indicated a mine fire. <br />The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and the DMG were notified. Emergency <br />measures were taken to seal the mine openings. Two days after the sealing of the mine openings, <br />there was an explosion in the mine, presumably due to a buildup of methane. MSHA directed <br />Oxbow Mining to drill emergency boreholes into the mine, for water injection and for gas <br />monitoring. In February of 1999, Oxbow Mining pumped about 88 acre-feet of water from the <br />North Fork of the Gunnison River,through one of the emergency boreholes, into the Sanbom <br />Creek Mine in the longwall azea where the spontaneous combustion event was suspected of <br />being located. <br />In April of 1999, Oxbow Mining concluded that additional inflow was coming into the mine and <br />might flood the longwall equipment. The source of the additional inflow was not known but the <br />approximate rate of inflow was about 200 gpm. With Division approval through Technical <br />Revision No. 34, Oxbow pumped out mine water into the North Fork of the Gunnison at a rate <br />of about 2000 gpm. The pumping occurred from July 1999 to the first week of October 1999. <br />The operator decided to dewater only half of the longwall panel in question and stabilize the <br />water level in the mine thereafter. The longwall restarted operations at the beginning of <br />November 1999. <br />In anticipation of the eventual mining out of the Sanbom Creek Mine B seam reserves, Oxbow <br />Mining, Inc. submitted, on November 6, 1998, a revision to begin construction of the new Elk <br />Creek Mine. Technical Revision No. 32 sought Division approval to construct the new portals <br />and their associated surface facilities, and to begin mining of private coal at this new mine. The <br />construction proposed in TR-32 increased the disturbed area by 23.7 acres. The proposed mine <br />location is to the north of the main Sanborn Creek Mine facilities, along the west side of Elk <br />Creek. TR-32 was approved in July of 2000. <br />In TR-32, Oxbow Mining proposed to construct two temporary fills over Elk Creek. Fill material <br />was placed within the channel of Elk Creek and the creek flow was diverted through two nine- <br />foot diameter culverts buried by the two fills. Oxbow Mining submitted a geotechnical stability <br />analysis demonstrating that the two fills in Elk Creek will be stable. For fmal reclamation of the <br />Elk Creek Mine facilities, the two nine-foot culverts will be removed and the Elk Creek channel <br />will be reconstructed incompliance with Rule 4.05.4. <br />These activities proposed in TR-32 required specific authorization by the Division in accordance <br />with Rule 4.05.4(4), Stream Channel Diversions (Relocation of Streams) and Stream Channel <br />Reconstruction, and Rule 4.05.18, Stream Buffer Zones. Therefore, the Division made the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.