Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The applicant, during the original permit revie'.+, contacted thz 1?ga' or <br />?7uitaole owner; of record of the surf ac? of the proposed perm : fired and the <br />State and local gcvernmEnt agencies which would have to initial?, implement. <br />approve or authoriz? the proposed use of the land folto'.ving rac'dmdticn. The <br />COn t3Cti 'der? made b'/ certified mall in Cider' to 5G11C1t dnv ~_~CnC?'"^5 Gr <br />comments for the proposed pest-mining land use plan (Tap i3> as r?quired by <br />Rule 2.J6.:('•)(b). No objections to the proposed post-mining leap usE were <br />-eceiv?d. The original application proeosed that the mine ca_rdnce haul road <br />and the first segment of Haul Road F Ctc the oii well pad) 'douid c? retalr.ec <br />in a reduced configuration for the post mine land use. Pond 006 des proposed <br />and apprG'ded 35 a permanent impoundment. Tne Oermit revision dpG`1CdtiC!n <br />':pest: rot?ntion cf Pcna 005 and Roads G antl H, 1n reauced c.nf'gurations. <br />T'12 read segments Will replace pre-Existing ranch redd5 dntl :`? '.mCCUndmen Li <br />d`i1 replace itGCk ponds dhiCh existed pr10r t0 mining. 7he~i2 S~rJCtUreS irE <br />dp•propriate for the post-:Wining land U52. A 5pEC1f1C iandcwner rEauest for <br />retention cf Haul Rcd v was not included in the application, and Stipulation <br />No. 18 '.vas included in Sec*.ion XX of this document to address Lhat requirement. <br />The Division hereby approves the post-mining land uses; the land uses being <br />rdnae!antl/grdz~ng for domestic livestock dnd wildlife and non-irrigated <br />cropland (2.07.6(2)(1)). The proposed operation is in ccmpiidnca with the <br />repuir?meats of thi; 5Et*.ion. <br />Iii. Cultural dnd Historic Rescurc?5 - Rules 2.C'a.4 dnd 2.05.5(=) <br />The applicant has conducted a number cf ;ate-specific litera-ur? sEirthes and <br />archeoicgital surveys of the permit ar?a between 1979 dnd 199C. RESU~ts cf <br />these studies can be found in Volume I, Tab 5, of the panic dpa~i~_iticn. <br />'rlest2rn CUltUr31 Resource Management, Inc. conducted a comp~et' p?~°__trian <br />SUrY?y pf the pr00o52d permit and ddjdc?nt area d55oCidt?d Wi lh pr?tdrdti on of <br />the original permit application in 1919. The stud'/ area '.vas id^;e~ tndn the <br />permit area. The 5Ur'/eV found ten 51125 dnd five 15013`?; find;. Cf these, <br />t'd0 'der? COnslder2d significant; d rock art sit? local?d OUtslde the permit <br />area and a potential camp site located within the permit boundary but outside <br />any disturbed area. it was originally determined that there would be no <br />impact to these sites from the operations. <br />Due to the permit arts expansion associated with PR ,Y1, Peabody ccntrart?d <br />with Me `calf ,archaeoiocicdl Consultants, Inc (M,~G , to survey the e.xpansien <br />aroa, M?.l. SUbstinti3`_2p the iiynlflCdnCe Of the pre'/iC:USI! IdE~t'f'e~ rCC:( <br />art 5'C? (SRT Il$) •Nithin the pr000%52d e~tpani'On dr?3 3Cp "?~=Jmri1E"7°: "Jr`her <br />testing dnd deCum2.^.L3tiCn ineUld the dr?3 pe imp3Cter1 p/ 11 i:1~n•~ ~J r' 35 iCC'3CE'~ <br />3Cti'/1 tlAS. Pe3pedy pfCOC52tl d mlttgat'cn plan wniCh 1nClUd?: p~C C.. ~.''iphiC <br />CGCJme~n tatlCn of the ro C< art panels dr,p posting of °JiSL~rpdCC? ~t':nCd r'/•' <br />Signs around the fCCk art and 3d]dCEnt fir?-rC%Ck 3f?as, tJ OE ilple!ilerCed <br />prior to initiation cr road construction or blasting within 2000 feet. <br />Peabody'S plan 'Was revie'ded and deemed etceptable by OSM and the State <br />Hi;torit Pr252rvd*ion Officer (SHPO). <br />- 10 - <br />