Laserfiche WebLink
3. TEXT CHANGES <br />No springs occur in the lease area or within 1 /2 mile <br />of the lease boundaries. The closest springs to the lease <br />area are located in Yellow Creek and Corral Gulch. <br />3.4.1.2 Surface N'arerQuality <br />There are no site-specific water quality data for the <br />ephemeral tributary drainages on the Lase tract area. Sparse <br />data in similar areas suggest that runoff probably contains <br />a few hundred milligrams per liter (mg/I) total dissolved <br />solids (TDS). A recent report by Tobin et al. (1985) and <br />water quality analyses published by the U.S. Geological <br />Survey indicate that the surface waters of Yellow Creek <br />and its tributaries can be classified as a mixed bicarbonate <br />type in the upper reaches, grading to a sodium bicarbonate <br />type in the lower reaches. This change in water quality <br />is thought to be caused by groundwater discharge from the <br />Uinta and Green River formations (W'eeks et al. 1974). <br />Water temperatures in Yellow Creek range Crom summer <br />highs in the 86°F to 95°F range, to 3:?°F during the winter <br />months. Specific conductance, which is related to TDS <br />content, typically is in the range of 800-1,500 uhmos (550- <br />1,000 mg/I TDS) in the upper reaches, and 3,000-4,000 <br />uhmos (2,000-2,500 mg/I TDS) at the mouth of the creek. <br />Dissolved solid concentrations typically decrease during the <br />spring high-Bow period because of dilution from snowmelt <br />runoff. During low-Flow periods, the amcentrations increase <br />because of irrigation return flow and groundwater discharge. <br />Piceance Creek has similar water quality; it also shows an <br />increase in TDS in a downstream direction, however, TDS <br />leveis are generally less in Piceance (:reek than in Yellow <br />Creek (Weeks et al. 1974). <br />3.4.2 Groundwater <br />3.4.1. l Regiow! Sening <br />The principal usable bedrock aquifers that occur in the <br />basin are commonly referred to as iihe upper and lower <br />aquifer systems of the Uinta and Grren River formations. <br />Figure 3-2 shows a generalized geohydrologic cross section <br />of the Piceance Basin aquifer system. These aquifers are <br />recharged at the higher elevations on the west, south, and <br />eastern margins of the basin, by lateral inFlow and deep <br />percolation to the upper aquifer through the Uinta <br />Formation. Flow is generally to the north~•zntral part of <br />the basin (Weeks et al. 1974). The aquifers discharge to <br />Piceance Creek and Yellow Creek •which discharge into <br />the White River. The Piceance Basin groundwater system <br />probably does not dscharge directly to the White River, <br />because the White River Flows on alluvium which rests <br />on the Wasatch Formation, which is hydrologically isolated <br />from the Green River Formation within the basin. For this <br />analysis, it is assumed that the groundwater transport of <br />salt/dissolved solids is a closed system in the Piceance Basin, <br />with all inputs restricted to the basin and out Flow by way <br />of discharge to Piceance and Yellow weeks. <br />Three major aquifer systems occur within the basin: the <br />alluvial, upper, and lower aquifers. These aquifers have <br />limited hydraulic connection with one another, and are <br />considered separate reservoirs. The degree and extent of <br />hydraulic connections are not yet fully understood and <br />probably vary considerably by location within the basin. <br />The major alluvial aquifers are restricted to stream valleys <br />and do not occur on uplands. Most of the stream valleys <br />in the basin contain recent alluvial material, ranging in <br />thickness up to 140 feet, are less than one-half mile in width, <br />and aze saturated in certain areas. This saturated zone is <br />the alluvial aquifer, which is generally unconfined and varies <br />greatly in size and yield from one stream valley to another. <br />The alluvial aquifer system is important, in that it functions <br />throughout most of the basin as a transient storage system <br />to move groundwater to or from streams and the deeper <br />aquifers. <br />The upper and lower aquifers are bedrock aquifers, within <br />the Uinta Formation and the Parachute Creek Member of <br />the Green River Formation (Figure 3-1 A). The upper aquifer <br />contains confined and unconfined water bearing zones and <br />extends from the top of the Mahogany Zone to the surface. <br />The upper portion of the Uintz Formation contains <br />discontinuous, unconfined water bearing zones (perched <br />aquifer) throughout the basin. These beds occur in the ridges <br />between stream valleys and usually can be identified by <br />the occurrence of springs above the valley bottoms. Perched <br />aquifers are sometimes associated with alluvial aquifers, <br />where streambeds intersect permeable outcrop areas. The <br />upper confined bedrock aquifer extends from the top of <br />the Mahogany Zane to the base of the unconfined Uinta. <br />The principal water bearing zone in the aquifer is the A- <br />Groove located just above the Mahogany Zone. The <br />remainder of the upper aquifer consists of confined water <br />bearing zones that vary with depth and permeability. <br />The lower aquifer extends from the dissolution surface <br />up to the base of the Mahogany Zone. The principal water <br />bearing zone is the B-Groove, and [he remainder of the <br />aquifer yields varying quantities of water depending on the <br />depth and the degree of secondazy porosity developed. <br />Secondary porosity is created principally by fracturing and <br />as a result oC dissolution of the soluble salt nodules and <br />layers within the oil shale. The secondary porosity developed <br />in the dissolution features could result in high rates of water <br />movement throughout the zone; however, the irregularity <br />and localized occurrence of the dissolution features also <br />accounts for some wide variations in porosity and <br />permeability. <br />3-5 <br />