3. TEXT CHANGES
<br />Wetland and waterfowl related impacts associated with
<br />the 500,000 TPY Altemative would persist through mine
<br />life, and to some degree until aquifer recharge. However,
<br />the applicant would be subject to (ally compensating
<br />waterfowl habitat value lost as a result of groundwater
<br />pumping (see revisions to Section 2.4.1.1.8)."
<br />Page 4-20
<br />(14)
<br />Column 1, paragraph 3, sentence 2: "The groundwater
<br />depletions (as shown in Table 43) although significant from
<br />this specific project, would ultimately reduce surface water
<br />volumes in the White River and downstream endangered
<br />species' fisheries due to the cumulative effects of all the
<br />projects in this area" should read: "Groundwater depletions
<br />shown in Table 4-3, although regionally insignificant for
<br />this individual project, would contribute cumulatively to
<br />reduced surface water volumes in the White River and
<br />downstream endangered species fisheries in association with
<br />other projects in the area (see Section 2.5, Baseline)."
<br />(14)
<br />Column 1, replace paragraphs 5 and 6: "Animal
<br />populations associated with Yellow Creek's palustrine
<br />wetlands would not be influenced by small compositional
<br />changes projected for inchannel emergent vegetation under
<br />the No Action, 50,000, and 125,000 TPY alternatives (see
<br />Section 4.9.6).
<br />Flow depletions projected for the 500,000 TPY
<br />Altemative have the potential to reduce or alter shrub-scrub
<br />and emergent wetland components by an appreciable, but
<br />undetermined degree (see Section 4.9.6). Stmcturally or
<br />compositionally unique habitat elements exist in the form
<br />of tamarisk stands (approximately 5 acres) and the nartow
<br />obligate emergent zone composed of sedges and bulrush
<br />adjacent to Yellow Creek's streambed (approximately 18
<br />acres). Small existing populations of species dependent on
<br />these features, including yellow warbler, yellowthroat and
<br />song spartow, could very well be subject to many years
<br />of habitat reduction and displacement. However, wetland
<br />related mitigation requirements (see Section 2.4.1.1.8) should
<br />adequately compensate these habitat losses in the long-term:'
<br />(6, 11, 14)
<br />Column 2, Section 4.9.6: Replace entire section.
<br />4.9.6 WETLAND HABITATS
<br />4.9.6.1 Flow Depletion Impacts
<br />Without a complete understanding of the mechanics
<br />governing wetland systems in Yellow Creek, BLM is unable
<br />to predict precise consequences of long-term flow reductions.
<br />Assuming wetland extent, composition, and condition are
<br />a function of streamflow, any base flow reductions would
<br />be expected to alter the distribution and quantity of moisture
<br />available for wetland maintenance.
<br />It should be emphasized that flow depletions in Yellow
<br />Creek (Table 4-7A) would develop gradually, reaching
<br />maximum mlcs 25 to 27 years after mining begins. Although
<br />maximum depletion rates have been applied to all
<br />calculations, interim flow loss would average 50 percent
<br />lower for the No Action, 50,000 TPY, and 125,000 TPY
<br />alternatives, and 25 percent lower for the 500,000 TPY
<br />Altemative. Depletions could persist for many years after
<br />mine life, although progressive recovery of ground and
<br />surface waters should commence soon after groundwater
<br />pumping ceases.
<br />4.9.6.1./ NoAtrlon,SO,000,andl?5,0007PYAlremarives
<br />Spring and early summer Bows are considered most
<br />important for plant establishment and growth-at a time
<br />when Yellow Creek's flows would be least influenced by
<br />mine-induced depletions (2 to 3 percent maximum, Table
<br />4-7A). Average late summer Uow depletions would increase
<br />slightly to 3 to 5 percent. During drought influenced years,
<br />average depletions through the entire growing season may
<br />be 5 to 7 percent, becoming most pronounced during late
<br />summer low-Bow periods when 12 percent average
<br />reductions could be realized (short-term events could
<br />approach 20 percent).
<br />BLM expects no net reduction of in-channel wetland
<br />acreage Gom Bow loss associated with these alternatives
<br />(Table 4-7A), although small compositional changes in the
<br />herbaceous emergent zone may occur. This could appear
<br />as a linear constriction of the obligate herbaceous community
<br />along the 12.9 miles of affected stream, with compensatory
<br />expansion of facultative herbs. BLM would expect unit-for-
<br />unit "exchange" of obligate to facultative emergents,
<br />involving less than 5 percent of obligate vegetation most
<br />years, and no more than 10 percent d wring drought influenced
<br />years.
<br />Spring runoff and intense summer storm flows appear
<br />to regulate the distribution of shrub-scrub wetlands by
<br />supporting the proliferation of woody species in overflow
<br />areas and restricting shrub encroachment to the high water
<br />perimeter. Since periodic and seasonal Gooding would not
<br />be perceptibly influenced bymine-induced dewatering under
<br />3-22
<br />
|