Laserfiche WebLink
3. TEXT CHANGES <br />Wetland and waterfowl related impacts associated with <br />the 500,000 TPY Altemative would persist through mine <br />life, and to some degree until aquifer recharge. However, <br />the applicant would be subject to (ally compensating <br />waterfowl habitat value lost as a result of groundwater <br />pumping (see revisions to Section 2.4.1.1.8)." <br />Page 4-20 <br />(14) <br />Column 1, paragraph 3, sentence 2: "The groundwater <br />depletions (as shown in Table 43) although significant from <br />this specific project, would ultimately reduce surface water <br />volumes in the White River and downstream endangered <br />species' fisheries due to the cumulative effects of all the <br />projects in this area" should read: "Groundwater depletions <br />shown in Table 4-3, although regionally insignificant for <br />this individual project, would contribute cumulatively to <br />reduced surface water volumes in the White River and <br />downstream endangered species fisheries in association with <br />other projects in the area (see Section 2.5, Baseline)." <br />(14) <br />Column 1, replace paragraphs 5 and 6: "Animal <br />populations associated with Yellow Creek's palustrine <br />wetlands would not be influenced by small compositional <br />changes projected for inchannel emergent vegetation under <br />the No Action, 50,000, and 125,000 TPY alternatives (see <br />Section 4.9.6). <br />Flow depletions projected for the 500,000 TPY <br />Altemative have the potential to reduce or alter shrub-scrub <br />and emergent wetland components by an appreciable, but <br />undetermined degree (see Section 4.9.6). Stmcturally or <br />compositionally unique habitat elements exist in the form <br />of tamarisk stands (approximately 5 acres) and the nartow <br />obligate emergent zone composed of sedges and bulrush <br />adjacent to Yellow Creek's streambed (approximately 18 <br />acres). Small existing populations of species dependent on <br />these features, including yellow warbler, yellowthroat and <br />song spartow, could very well be subject to many years <br />of habitat reduction and displacement. However, wetland <br />related mitigation requirements (see Section 2.4.1.1.8) should <br />adequately compensate these habitat losses in the long-term:' <br />(6, 11, 14) <br />Column 2, Section 4.9.6: Replace entire section. <br />4.9.6 WETLAND HABITATS <br />4.9.6.1 Flow Depletion Impacts <br />Without a complete understanding of the mechanics <br />governing wetland systems in Yellow Creek, BLM is unable <br />to predict precise consequences of long-term flow reductions. <br />Assuming wetland extent, composition, and condition are <br />a function of streamflow, any base flow reductions would <br />be expected to alter the distribution and quantity of moisture <br />available for wetland maintenance. <br />It should be emphasized that flow depletions in Yellow <br />Creek (Table 4-7A) would develop gradually, reaching <br />maximum mlcs 25 to 27 years after mining begins. Although <br />maximum depletion rates have been applied to all <br />calculations, interim flow loss would average 50 percent <br />lower for the No Action, 50,000 TPY, and 125,000 TPY <br />alternatives, and 25 percent lower for the 500,000 TPY <br />Altemative. Depletions could persist for many years after <br />mine life, although progressive recovery of ground and <br />surface waters should commence soon after groundwater <br />pumping ceases. <br />4.9.6.1./ NoAtrlon,SO,000,andl?5,0007PYAlremarives <br />Spring and early summer Bows are considered most <br />important for plant establishment and growth-at a time <br />when Yellow Creek's flows would be least influenced by <br />mine-induced depletions (2 to 3 percent maximum, Table <br />4-7A). Average late summer Uow depletions would increase <br />slightly to 3 to 5 percent. During drought influenced years, <br />average depletions through the entire growing season may <br />be 5 to 7 percent, becoming most pronounced during late <br />summer low-Bow periods when 12 percent average <br />reductions could be realized (short-term events could <br />approach 20 percent). <br />BLM expects no net reduction of in-channel wetland <br />acreage Gom Bow loss associated with these alternatives <br />(Table 4-7A), although small compositional changes in the <br />herbaceous emergent zone may occur. This could appear <br />as a linear constriction of the obligate herbaceous community <br />along the 12.9 miles of affected stream, with compensatory <br />expansion of facultative herbs. BLM would expect unit-for- <br />unit "exchange" of obligate to facultative emergents, <br />involving less than 5 percent of obligate vegetation most <br />years, and no more than 10 percent d wring drought influenced <br />years. <br />Spring runoff and intense summer storm flows appear <br />to regulate the distribution of shrub-scrub wetlands by <br />supporting the proliferation of woody species in overflow <br />areas and restricting shrub encroachment to the high water <br />perimeter. Since periodic and seasonal Gooding would not <br />be perceptibly influenced bymine-induced dewatering under <br />3-22 <br />