Laserfiche WebLink
• Brown and Cuacninge, 1992). An arcuate rock failure zone ie an area <br />along the cliff where joints intersect, making mass wasting of the <br />sandstone more likely. According to Rosa-Brown and Cummings, "The <br />arcuate failure in Zone 6 ie at the treat of the cliff and shows <br />evidence of incipient movement. It posse a hazard because it can <br />be reactivated." (pp. 12 & 13) The authors also state, "The <br />analysis indicates that the joint orientations have the potential <br />for creating unstable blocks and wedges in Hazard Zones 5 and <br />6....Mininq can be expected to lower the cliff three or four feet. <br />In our professional judgement, this disturbance ie likely to <br />increase the continuity of existing joints and create new joints. <br />This has the potential to lead to a large number of block and wedge <br />failures." <br />From the above discussion, it is concluded that the stratified <br />sediments in the rockehelter are in some danger of being affected <br />by mining. Hass wasting of tha sandstone cliff could destroy the <br />entire rockehelter. Whether or not the fill of the rockehelter <br />will be affected by mining cannot be stated with certainty. If <br />nothing ie done to mitigate the potential damage to the stratified <br />deposits and damage dose occur, then an eligible archaeological <br />Bite will have been impacted without prior mitigation. Sufficient <br />excavation must be completed to answer basic questions such ae: <br />When was the rockehelter occupied? What cultural group or groups <br />occupied the rockehelter? What activities were carried out at the <br />rockehelter? A mitigation plan for the rockehelter will be <br />developed by the lessee and submitted for review and approval. <br />If CWCC consults with the Ute and Shoshone tribes about possible <br />• Native American religious concerns at site SRT345 and mitigates <br />impacts to the site to the satisfaction of the tribes, no <br />significant adverse impacts would occur. <br />Paleontolow <br />No significant disturbance ie expected to occur to any foeeile that <br />may be on or near the surface, therefore a surface survey is not <br />required for paleontological resources. There ie potential for <br />scientifically significant foeeile to be found within the roof, <br />floor, or coal of the seem to be mined. If ouch foeeile are found, <br />the information gained would be a beneficial impact to the science <br />of paleontology. If any foeeile that might be found were destroyed <br />or not reported and curated, it would be an adverse impact that <br />could be significant. This adverse impact would be mitigated to an <br />acceptable level if the operator would cease activity in the <br />vicinity of the fossil location and notify the authorized officer <br />immediately upon discovery. <br />Economic/Social Conditions <br />Issuance of this lease will add 3-5 years to the overall mine life, <br />allowing the continued employment of nearly 500 people. This would <br />benefit local businesses. The proposed action would bring <br />additional royalty revenue to the United States, State of Colorado, <br />and Aoutt County. Issuance of this lease would be a beneficial <br />impact to the economic and social conditions of the area. <br />• <br />15 <br />