Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />1 <br />> • <br />Mr. James Kent <br />February 3, 1982 <br />Page Two <br />Even though we are not developing <br />continuing to reclaim the existing pit. <br />significant expense, and I would think <br />Reclamation Division can appreciate the <br />efforts. <br /> <br />the new mine area, we are <br />This is being done at <br />the Colorado Mined Land <br />good faith shown by these <br />In summary, it is in the best interest of our customers and <br />our mine employees to see that permits are obtained as soon as <br />possible so that other arrangements, such as sales contracts and <br />equipment procurement, can be pursued unencumbered by a question- <br />able permit status. For us to do anything but encourage the <br />expedient acquisition of a permit would not be consistent with <br />good business practices; i.e., the disruption and cost of a mine <br />closure should not be the result of permitting delays. <br />If you have any questions or would desire additional discussion <br />on this subject, please do not hesitate to give me a call. It is <br />~';' definately not our intent to alienate the CMLR Division, but instead <br />we would hope to have a complimentary working relationship. <br />Very truly yours, <br />/~ <br />Karl M. Kolin <br />Manager of Engineering <br />KMK/tl <br />cc: Dave 6helton <br />Chips Barry <br />