Laserfiche WebLink
Table 1- Summar of Histor of Permit C-81-044 <br />Date Permit Action <br />2/28/94 Permit Renewal RN-02 a roved. <br />8/95 Minin ceases (entered rem or cessation status 12/3/95) <br />Renewa! RN-03: <br /> Division sends letter reminding REC of renewal application due 3/10/98 <br />12/5/97 to ensure successive rioht of renewal. <br />2/24/98 Division receives renewal a lication RN-03. <br /> Division finds application RN-03 incomplete due to a deficient public <br />2/26/98 <br /> notice. and notifies REC of the deficiencies. <br /> Division receives corrected public notice from REC and finds renewal <br />3!9!98 application RN-03 complete. Division sends completeness notification <br /> letters to mailing list. <br /> Division receives comment letters from: <br /> a) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers suggesting eroded west bank of <br /> Williams Fork River in permit area could use stabilization with <br /> vegetation; <br /> b) Colorado Historical Society saying that finding archeological <br />3/24, 3/31, and <br /> resources during mining requires work interruption; and <br />4/13/98 c) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concurring with a "no effect" <br /> determination For threatened and endangered species, and asks to <br /> be notified upon reactivated mining. <br /> All three letters were forwarded to REC, and sent to courthouse for <br /> ublic ostin No other comments were received. <br /> Division's AVS check results in "conditional issue" recommendation due <br />4/3!98 to unresolved violations of related out-of-state entities. <br />619!98 Division sends ade uac review letter to REC re ardin various items. <br /> Division sends adequacy review letter to REC regarding baseline <br />6/24!98 <br /> ve elation data. <br /> Division sends adequacy review letter to REC regarding new reclamation <br />6/30/98 <br /> cost estimate. <br />9/ 15/98 Division receives REC's res onses to ade uac review letter of 6/9/98. <br />10/5/98 Division sends ade uac review letter to REC re ardin various items. <br />6/2/00 Division's AVS check results in "issue" recommendation <br /> Division receives REC's responses to all outstanding adequacy review <br />7/26/00 <br /> comments. <br />10/23/00 Division's AVS check results in "issue" recommendation <br />4 <br />