My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL33175
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL33175
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:18 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:32:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/23/2000
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN3
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Downdip monitoring well (83-03). The water level in the Middle Sandstone well <br />farthest from mine workings has been gradually recovering since mining ceased in <br />1995. Its level had dropped 50 ft. from 1985 to 1997. Water quality has shown no <br />impact from mining. The trends in water levels and the stable water quality indicate <br />mining has not adversely impacted the Middle Sandstone aquifer outside the permit <br />boundary. <br />Ttivenryrnile Sandstone <br />Water level monitoring data reported through the 1998 annual hydrology report <br />show no change in the piezometric levels in the Twentymile Sandstone that could <br />be attributable to mining activities. The water quality data for the two Twentymile <br />Sandstone wells, No. 9 Mine Well and Well 259, show no adverse impact or trend. <br />Willinms Fork Alluvium <br />Ground water levels in the alluvium have remained fairly rel;ulaz, with normal <br />seasonal fluctuations apparently related to changes in river Ir:vels. Ground water <br />levels in the alluvium aze plotted in Figure 22 in Section 2.04.7 of the permit <br />application package. Annual hydrology reports through 199£. indicate no depletion <br />has occurred and mining appears to not have affected Williams Fork River alluvial <br />water quality. <br />Observed Surface Water Impacts <br />Discharges from the 5 and 6 mines have not caused measurable depletion of stream <br />flows in the mine vicinity. IF all of the mine inflows during active mining (approxi- <br />mately 2 cfs) came from the Williams Fork and Yampa Rivers, it would be too <br />small of a depletion to detect in those rivers' 7-day/10-yeaz low flows. Monitoring <br />data in the mines' annual hydrology reports from 1981 through 1998 indicate the <br />Eagle Mines have not impacted the water quality of the Williams Fork River. <br />G. No surface water is proposed to be discharged or directed into underground mine <br />workings. <br />H. RAG Empire does not plan to convert any monitoring wells to water supply wells. <br />I. Stream Buffer Zones -Rule 4.05.18 <br />The Eagle Mine Complex includes several structures which are located within 100 <br />feet of the perennial Williams Fork River. These structures are a coal storage silo, <br />a 48-inch cross country conveyor, waste water ponds, No. 5 Mine dewatering wells <br />and associated substation and access road, haul road bridge, well 259 and pond <br />HR-P1, and rail road at tail [rack end. The conveyor is an e:aclosed structure as it <br />crosses the river and the highway, therefore minimizing disturbance to the stream. <br />The coal storage silo is a concrete structure utilized to load ;railroad cars. These <br />vaziances from the I00-foot buffer zone for perennial streams have been granted by <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.