Laserfiche WebLink
The probable hydrologic consequences of mining at the Bourg site were evaluated <br />in the original permit application. The consequences relative to surface water <br />were (l) that the runoff from the mine area would be increased and (2) that a <br />portion of the runoff would be stored in sedimentation ponds and lost to <br />evaporation. At this point, ten years after reclamation, neither of these <br />consequences are realized. <br />The original analysis pointed out that the Bourg property makes up only 14% of <br />the total azea of the Mann Draw drainage area. As such, runoff would need to be <br />significantly enhanced to cause negative impacts. At this time, the 160 acres of <br />the Bourg property are the most densely vegetated land in that drainage azea. So <br />despite the fact that a gravel pad and several roads remain, it is doubtful that <br />the runoff from the Bourg property is even as great as it was before mining. <br />Visual inspection confirms no evidence of high runoff. The findings indicate that <br />there are no detrimental surface water impacts from the reclaimed Bourg Strip Mine. <br />G. Probable Hydrologic Consequences of Mining on Groundwater <br />Groundwater has been monitored to observe the effects of mining in the alluvial aquifer <br />of Mann Draw. The geologic structure and consequent hydrologic setting of the Bourg <br />permit area subsurface made this a logical approach. The Bourg Mine is underlain by a <br />Northwest-plunging syncline. The Coalmont formation in the core of the syncline <br />contains sandstone and siltstone units with some water-carrying capacity. <br />Water infiltrating the spoils which replaced the Coalmont and the Sudduth coal will either <br />recharge the bedrock units of the Coalmont formation or flow downgradient through <br />Mann Draw alluvium toward the Canadian River. Recharge of the Coalmont units <br />probably resumed after reclamation, but there are no wells documented within that <br />formation to the northwest of the mine. So the principle potential for groundwater impact <br />is in the Mann Draw alluvium. <br />Water quality has been measured in the alluvium both upgradient (upstream of the <br />impacts of mining) and downgradient of the reclaimed mine area. As would be expected, <br />there has been some degradation of water quality at the downstream site. Sodium, <br />chloride, sulfate, and total dissolved solids still show higher levels downgradient of the <br />mine, and pH is increased. However, the concentrations of these constituents have <br />stabilized or even decreased over the last 5 years. TDS, for example, has decreased from <br />a high near 1700 mg/1 in the early 1990s to values from 1200 mg/1 to less than 1000 mg/1 <br />in 1997. Upgradient water chemistry is much more variable that the water leaving the <br />site. In fact, the upgradient well was dry for most of the sampling events in the 1990s, <br />and has held measurable water again only the last two years. The hydrochemistry of the <br />upgradient water undoubtedly fluctuates with the volume of water flowing through the <br />system. <br />Bourg Strip Mine. C-81-021 20 August 4, 1998 <br />