Laserfiche WebLink
A. Alternative One -Proposed Action <br />Minerals <br />Subsidence could occur due to the extraction of coal on retnaat in the application area. The most likely <br />showing on the surface would be gradual lowering of the surface without any surface disturbances such <br />as tension cracks, although surface fractures could occur. In addition, as a result of the requirement for <br />the quarterly monitoring of the area for subsidence and the {Treater thickness of overburden, it is not <br />anticipated that subsidence would be evidenced. <br />Exhibit 60 of the Mountain Coal Company, West Elk Mining and Reclamation Plan discusses subsidence <br />at the West Elk Mine. Table 3.3.4.2 predicts that maximum subsidence for longwall mining of the B <br />seam is 7.97 feet and for room and pillar mining of the F seam is 2.25 feet. Predictions for the D/E <br />seam are not available. The F seam will not be mined on the tract and it is assumed that predictions for <br />subsidence for the F seam will be similar to the D/E seam or 2.25 feet. In areas where both seams will <br />be mined, maximum subsidence on the tract is predicted to be 10.22 feet. <br />Bluffing at the outcrop could occur but geologic conditions of the coal will not allow mining close to the <br />outcrop, therefore Bluffing is unlikely. <br />Transportation <br />There is no coal truck traffic increase expected as a result of this operation. At 4 million tons per year <br />production, seven to eight trains per week would haul coal and at maximum production of 5.0 million <br />tons per year, nine to ten trains per week would haul coal out of the valley from the West Elk Mine. At <br />maximum production for all mines in the North Fork, train traffic would increase to 14 trains per week. <br />This is an increase of three trains per week from the number of trains per week hauling coal in 1993. <br />County wide traffic associated with coal related growth would not be expected to significantly overload <br />any county or State road system. While traffic accidents would be expected to increase an unspecified <br />amount, the accident rate (accident per vehicle mile) itself would not be expected to increase. <br />Wildlife and Endangered Species <br />Surface disturbances and activity associated with development and operation of above ground coal <br />mining facilities would affect wildlife to the extent they would destroy habitat, disrupt behavioral <br />activities, causing increased competition on adjacent areas, cause direct mortality, or decreased natality. <br />Existing stands of Grand Mesa penstemon, a candidate species, would be disturbed with initial <br />disturbances. In the long term though, they could be increased since this species appears to be <br />disturbance dependant. However, plant survey would be required prior to any surface disturbance to <br />determine their presence. <br />Breeding and nesting habitat of the loggerhead shrike and other neotropical birds would be diminished by <br />disturbances in sagebrush, Gambel oak, and riparian vegetation stands. Disturbances in the sagebrush <br />and oak stands should be avoided to the extent possible. No disturbances should occur within the <br />designated riparian areas. <br />Bald eagle nest sites, winter roost sites, and winter concentration areas, and Golden eagle nest sites <br />which may be established during the life of this project would be affected to the degree disturbances <br />would occur. Through consultation with the Service and Colorado Division of Wildlife protective <br />measures have been developed to protect these sites. <br />Water depletion associated with coal mining on this tract would impact populations of Colorado <br />squawfish, Razorback sucker, Humpback chub, and Bonytail chub and their critical habitats found <br />downstream in the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers. Even though there is no anticipated water use or <br />Page 13 <br />