Laserfiche WebLink
COMPLETED, AND THE RESULTS SUBMITTED TO THE DIVISION FOP. REVIEW. NO PILLAR <br />RECOVERY SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE AFFECTED PANELS PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF DIVISION <br />APPROVAL. IF SUBSIDENCE MONITORING I.YPERIENCE OR THE DETAILED STABILITY <br />ANALYSIS INDICATE THE SECONDARY EXTRACTION WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE STABILITY <br />OF THE LANDSLIDE DEPOSIT ABOVE THE TOWN OF SOhfERSET, THEN ARCO SHALL LZAfIT <br />EXTRACTION OF THESE PANELS TO 50%. THE AFFECTED PANELS ARE THE THREE NORTHERN- <br />hfOST PANELS TO THE WEST OF THE MAINS WITHIN SECTION 17. <br />MLRD Findings Ibcument: Stipulation No. 43, p. 47 <br />OSM Findings Ik7cument: Stipulation No. 41, p. 1I <br />OSM TER: This stipulation has not been includec in the TEA. <br />28. Stipulation: THE DIVISION DIRECTS ARCO COAL, AS A PORTION OF ITS SUBSEQUENT <br />PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR THE MT. GUNNISON NO. 1 hfINE, TO SUBMIT A REVISED <br />SUBSIDENCE EVALUATION. TIfE SUBSIDENCE EVALUATION FOR THE NEXT PERMIT PERIOD <br />SHALL INCORPORATE SHE RESULTS OF SUBSIDENCE MONITORING RND THE LANDSLIDES <br />STABILITY STUDIES STIPULATED ABOVE IN THE DESIGNATING REFINED "SAFE AREAS" <br />BUFFER BOUNDARIES TO BE OBSERVED IN FUTURE h1ININC BENEATH CRITICAL AREAS, <br />INCLUDING THE DRY FORK OF MINNESOTA CREEK, BEAVER RESERVOIR AND THE LAND- <br />SLIDE DEPOSITS ADJOINING ZT. THE AMENDED ,SUBSIDENCE EVALUATION SHALL INCLUDE <br />THE PROPOSAL OF APPROPRIATE SUBSIDENCE MONITORING NETWORKS WZTHIfJ EACH OF <br />THESE CRITICAL AREAS. <br />MLRD Findings Document: Stipulation fJO. 44, p. 47 <br />OSM Findings Document: Stipulation No. 42, p. lI <br />OShI TEA: This stipulation has not bee((((n~~~~included in the TEA. <br />~9. Sti elation: TH PPLZCANT SN L INSTAND MONITOR THE 2 PROPOSED MONITORING <br />\\ WELLS WHICH WILL~E LOCATE B I IAL WASTE ROCK PILE PRIOR TO CON- <br />STRUCTION THE PIT~A~L T S~ UBhfIT TO THF. REGULATOR I' AUTHORITY <br />~' WELL COh1PLETION R RTS, AND GROUND Lro'A TER LEVEL QUALITY DATA PRIOR TO PLACING <br />WASTE ROCK IN THE PILE. <br />to <br />4" <br />=', <br />~:~' MLRD Findings Document: Stipulation No. 21, p. 18 <br />OSM Findings Document: Stipulation No. 12, p. 6 <br />OSAI TEA: Stipulation No. 8, p. 31 <br />30. Sti elation: ARCO COAL h1UST RERUN CHEMICAL ANALYSES OF F-SEAM ROOF, FLOOR, <br />INTERBURDEN AND COAL FROhf ORIGINA CGRES ANALYZED ( SOM-2, SOM-ti, SOM-38, <br />SOM-50, SOhI 5 5Oh1-65r-AND b 9) OR F 6 ALTERNATE CORES REPRESENTATIVE OF <br />THE h1INE f'Lr: v~cn .~~ 6 E O RUN FOR THOSE PARAMETERS REQUIRED <br />BY THE DIVIS A RUN B THE M NOD 'LISTED ON ATTACHED APPENDIX A, <br />BASELINE OVERBURDEN CHEMICAL-h1INERAL ANAL]SIS. THESE ANALYSES SHALL BE SUB- <br />~~ h1I TIED TO THE DIVISION WITHIN 6 hfONTHS OF TXE FERh1IT ISSUING, AND SHALL BE <br />REPORTED AS INCLUSIONS TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. <br />MLRD Findings Document: Stipulation i1'o. 1, p. 2 <br />OSM Findings Document: Stipulation No. 32, p. 9 <br />OSh1 TEA: Stipulation No. 7, p. 30 as follows: <br /> <br />