GENERAL33082

• Permit No: C1980004
• IBM Index Class Name: General Documents
• Doc Date: 3/4/1982
• Doc Name: PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
• Permit Index Doc Type: FINDINGS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

• -4 .
8. -IjITHIN ONE YEAR OF PER*fIT ISSUA?+CE, THE PERPfITTEE KILL SUBMIT A
PLAN TO THE DIVISION FOR SURFACE ?L4NIPLZATION Or Tur c0IL5 TO EN?1A*:CE
?fOISTURE RETENTIOT: AND REDUCE EROSION DUTiI1dG RECLA?fATION. THIS PLAN
WILL BE REVIE[dED BT THE DIVISIO"~ FOR APPROVAL AA'D IIITIATED BI' THE
PER?fI TTEE .
9. Ii: LIEU OF PRODUCTIVITY DATA FRO?i THE GREASEh'OOD SHRUBLAND, SHADSCALE
SHRUBLAND, A?;D JUNIPER WOODL.?ND REFERENCE AREAS, THE PER*fiTTEE IS DIRECTED
TO UTILIZE COMBINED PicCLANE AND ?fUNGER PER?FINE DATA FOR PRODUCTIVITY
FOR EACH VEGETATIVE CO?f?fUNIT1' RESPECTIVELY. THIS DATA SHALL BE SUBJECT
TO THE REVEGETATION SUCCESS CRITERIA OF L.15.8(3)(b).
10. I;ITHIN 60 DAPS OF PER*fIT ISSUANCE THE FER?.ITTEE SHALL SUPPLY THE
DIVISION h'ITH ADEQUATE WOODY PLANI DENSITI DATA FOR THE GREASE[700D,
SHADSCALE, AND JUNIPER CO?LMUNITIES TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO
54MPLE SIZE, SAPiPLE MEA1;, SAMPLE VARIANCE, AATD LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE
ACHIEVED.
11. THE PER?fITTEE MUST PROVIDE JIISTIFICATION TO THE DIVISION FOR THE i100DY
PLANT DENSITY REVEGETATION LE\*ELS PROPOSED. THE DIVISION AA'D THE
PERMITTEE TdILL DETERMINE AN ACCEPTABLE LE1'EL 1,'ITHI?t 90 DA2'S OF PER*fIT
ISSUANCE.
12. THE PERMITTEE AND THE DIVISION i;ILL DETERMINE A ?fEANS FDR THE EVALUATION
Or' SPECIES DIVERSITI' r+T THE McCLr1L\E CAi~^.'ON SITE h'ITHIN 90 DAPS OF
PERPfIT ISSUANCE.
13. THE PER?1ITTEE ?fUST DEVELOP, WITHIN ONE PEAR OF PER?iIT ISSUANCE, A
BIENNIAL REVEGETATIO?: MONITORING PROGRA?S h'HICH 12ILL MO?2ITOR THE SUCCESS
OF REVEGETATION EFFORTS AT THE McCLANE CANYON SITE, TO EE APPROVED ET
THE DIVISION A1vTD INITIATED THE SECOND YEAR AFTEF THE INITIAL REVEGETATION
SEEDING.
14. WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF PERPiIT ISSUANCE THE PER?fITTEE *fUST PROVIDE THE
DIVISION SdITH A SPECIFIC PROPOSAL FOR THE FINAL CO's@FIGURATION OF
THE PORTAL BENCH CUT. SUFFICIENT r.NALYSES ?fUST BE PRESENTED TO VERTPI'
THAT THE PROPOSED FINAL CONFIGURATION TILL ?fEET ALL STABILITY REQLIIRE?lENTS
OF RULE 4.14. IF THE FINAL CONFIGLT:ATION WILL DA.R'= rR0?; THE A°PROYSI.I9TE
ORIGINAL CONTOUR OF THE AREA, TY.E PER*fITTEE *1L'ST REQUEST A VARIANCE IN
ACCORDAJ4CE WITH RULE 2.06.5.
15. A PERFORPIAN'CE BOND IN THE A?fOL'.tiT OF $5~., 750.OC, PAYAELE TO THE STATE
OF COLORADO, MUST BE FILED S:ITH THE DIVISION WITHI?~ 36 DAPS OF PER*fIT
ISSUANCE.
Explanations of the stipulations can be found in the Findings part of this
package.
The permit cannot be issued until all statutory- notice and public comment
requirements have been satisfied.