My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32987
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:13 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:28:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/2/1984
Doc Name
Revised Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-32- <br />~U1 <br />~ _ <br />fragment size distribution of caving overburden and coal strata; 4) the <br />exposed surface areas of roof, floor, coal faces, and coal pillars; 5) the <br />geochemistry of the rock dust used; 6) mining debris left in the mine; 7) the <br />chemistry of back-stowed wastes; and 8) the residency time of mine waters <br />before disc hargirtg to the surface waters or to the overlying or underlying <br />ground water aquifers. <br />The "f" and "P" seams contain low sulfur contents. Organic sulfur <br />predominates, ranging between 0.32% and 0.61%, with a mean of 0.45%, in the <br />"F" seam, and between 0.23% and 0.50%, with a mean of 0.32%, in the "P" seam. <br />Pyritic sulfur is low and varies between 0.03X and 0.32%, with a mean value of <br />0.09%, for the "F" seam, and 0.02X and 0.09%, with a mean value of 0.05%, for <br />the "P" seam. Only one sample of the "P" seam coal had a sulfate <br />concentration of 0.01%. All other samples had sulfate levels below detection <br />limits. Sulfur analyses conducted by the applicant indicate that the coals <br />have low acid-forming potential. Thus, the exposed coal seams within the mine <br />workings will not form acid mine waters. However, other associated and <br />affected strata may be acid-forming. There are no sulfur form analyses for <br />the roof, floor and interburden for the "F" seam coal (Eagle No. 5 mine). In <br />lieu of conducting geochemical analyses of the roof, floor and interburden <br />associated with the "f" seam coal, the applicant has proposed to periodically <br />monitor the water quality in the new sump constructed within the Eagle No. 5 <br />Mine. The applicant submitted to the Division copies of the laboratory <br />analyses of fresh mine inflow water and sump water collected 54 days after the <br />company began filling the sump. Laboratory results are contained in Tables 1 <br />and 2 of the company's November 15, 1983 stipulation response submittal. An <br />analysis of the results of the study are contained on pages IV-126 through <br />IV-128 of the revised permit application. The results of the sump study show <br />no significant changes in mine water quality. <br />The sump study may closely simulate short term stagnations of mine inflow <br />waters during mining. During mining, the residence time of inflow waters will <br />be minimal, since constant discharging of mine water will be needed to <br />maintain the operation of the mine. The inflow water will have a minimal time <br />to chemically react within the mine workings. This will result in a slight <br />increase in dissolved solids in waters discharged to the surface during <br />operations. <br />The sump study may not be representative of the post mining water quality <br />changes, since this study may have analyzed sump water which may not have had <br />sufficient time to react with the mine workings. The sump was being filled <br />during the 54-day period, thus there was a continuous dilution of sump water <br />over the period. The sump water quality may also been low owing to the point <br />at which the sump water sample was taken. Areas closer to the source of <br />inflow would have water qualities similar to mine inflow waters. Areas deeper <br />in the sump may have significantly different water qualities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.