GENERAL32850 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

iii iuiiiiinnuii The Corley Company Pnone 6925060 PO eo+,B2, COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO 8090 Jan. 25, 1994 JA'~1 2 6 l°:;4 Nt. Larry P• Koutten Uivisiun of Niner.~lc f. CeoJcRy 1313 Sherman St. Denver CC E0203 Uear Mr. Routten: ,: Our understanding of. the Dec. 21, 1993, meeting wa;~ that you were going to prepare the amended agreement and the proposed ]ette.- .c the board for our review. Obviously, there was no meeting of the minds regarding the letter. Specifically about the letter, you only state that "the previous modelling was in error". There is no indication of the ms~nitude of error which is approximately 600Y,. You state that the undersized culvert resulted in "some. problems". fde th'_nk that any reader of the lector would mir~imi:.e the impact of the "problems". Yon do mention that the DMG-Harrison-[Jestern-Corley agreement states [!ra[ the Division determined that the actt,al cost will not exceed $18,500, but you do not mention that there was no consCruction plan on which to base that cost estimate. Further, the loe~ bid for the work was not $29,000, but $?3,000. Since you want us to co.:.r.:unicate any corrections to the Roard, we do not believe that you have completed your pr.rt cf the agreement. We no longer wish to go ahead with our ^.nggested compromise. We understand now that any future agreement must be in writing. Do you }lave any suggestions? With regard to the D14G le"ter to the Vento Trust, there is a property description for the. Puck Pond of the "Eft}t Sec 24". That same description was used for the Vento Trust property. The Etiti of a sr_ction does not exist. The Duck Fond is in the SEIyNEti and the NE'--tSFf~ Sec. 24. The Vento Trust does not own any land in Sec. 24• they owr, the F4r', Sec. 19. Mr. Robinson was confused about the location. W ~~~ W.D. Corley, President