Laserfiche WebLink
-33- <br />XVI. Explosives - Rules 2.05.3(b) and 4.08 <br />No explosives will be used or stored in conjunction with this operation. None <br />of the requirements of this section apply. <br />XVII. Backfi <br />sding - Rules 2.05.3(6)(b), 2.05.3(9), 2.05.4(2 <br />4.13 and 4.14 <br />Information regarding backfilling and grading of disturbed areas is presented <br />in Sections 2.2.2, 3.1 and 3.3 of Volume I and Appendix 0 of Volume V of the <br />application. L~tails of the waste disposal pile are presented in Sections 2.2.5 <br />and 4.5.3.3.4 of Volume I and Appendix N of Volume V of the application. These <br />materials have been reviewed by the Division for compliance with the Rules and <br />Regulations. <br />The applicant proposes not to backfill the workings to achieve approximate <br />original contour. The application contains a description and cross-sections of <br />proposed backfilling and grading plans for the mine portal bench area and for <br />the haul road. <br />The upper haul road segment between the confluence of the Munger Creek Valley and <br />the unnarr~d tributary to the Munger Creek Valley (Sta. 67+00') to, and including, <br />the mine portal bench area, is characterized by steep slopes, commonly in excess <br />of 200. Under the regulations of the Rule 4.27, Operations on Steep Slopes, <br />the applicant is allowed variance from approximate original contour, if the <br />approximate original contour donfiguration will not achieve a static slope safety <br />factor of 1.3, as required by Rule 4.14. Ideally, the entire highwall shall be <br />backfilled to achieve a safety factor of 1.3. In situations in which a static <br />slope safety factor of I.3 cannot be achieved, the applicant proposes to backfill <br />to that configuration which will maximize the static slope safety factor of that <br />portion of the backfilled slope. Remaining portions of the exposed cut slopes <br />will be treated to achieve a surface which is as erosionally and as structurally <br />stable as is possible. <br />In response to Division com~mnt, the applicant developed typical backfilled <br />cross-sections, similar to the operational road cross-sections depicted in Figure <br />2.2-23. The applicant's detailed backfilling and grading proposals are supported <br />by thorough stability analyses of the proposed backfill and grading configurations <br />for the haul road and portal bench areas. The analysis demonstrated that the <br />redesigned reclaimed configurations' stabic slope safety factors exceed those <br />of the predisturbance natural slopes. <br />The applicant's original permit application contained several deficiencies with <br />regard to the underground development waste pile, which have been remedied in <br />supplemental submittals. In response to the Division's Preliminary Adequacy <br />Review, the applicant has prepared and submitted an acceptable geotechnical and <br />stability analysis of the proposed 25,000 cubic yard underground development <br />waste pile. This analysis determined that the pile will achieve a minimum static <br />slope safety factor of 1.684, based upon conservative assumptions of the waste <br />material's strength. The applicant is also committed to an inspection and <br />certification program which conforms with the requirements of Rule 4.09.1(11). <br />The applicant's plan for the disposal of underground development waste of the <br />Munger Canyon Mine is in compliance with the requirements of Rules 2.05.3(6) <br />and 4.09. <br />