My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32613
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:04 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:21:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/14/1983
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />-26- <br />Existing surface water monitoring data taken at .the mine over the past <br />two years Indicates that suspended sediment levels downstream of the mine <br />are equal or lower than the upstream monitoring site about 50X of the <br />time. Th15 shows, in part, that the sediment control system is <br />functioning. <br />The sediment ponds themselves have the potential of affecting water <br />quantity. Ponds may impound water that otherwise would 6e available to <br />the receiving stream. The total amount of water to be impounded at the <br />mine area 1s only 5.6 acre-feet. This amount is 0.0005X of the total <br />flow in Thompson Creek (12,100 acre-feet/year). However, the Division <br />still requires the operator to dewater the ponds within 72 hours as a <br />mitigation measure to water rights holders downstream. <br />The underground mine workings generate water that may, 1n part, be <br />tributary to the North and Middle Thompson Creeks. Part of this water is <br />consumed by the operation and part is discharged back into the North <br />Thompson Creek. This aspect of the operation may cause several potential <br />surface water impacts. <br />Assuming all tnfiows in the mine ire from stream flews (a conservative <br />assumption), the amount •f water 1eNletel from North and Middle Thompson <br />Creeks from Mines No. 1 and N~. 3 combined is 1.3 cfs. This is, at <br />present, a worse-case appr~xtmati~n. Future m~nttrrring shaul~ show the <br />depletion to be less than predicted. <br />Assuming all mine inflows came solely from North Thompson Creek and <br />assuming all water is c~nsume~ (a c~nservattve approach), depletions <br />would amount to 217 acre-feet/year, •r 1.3 cfs average discharge (see <br />Table 4). This is •nly a mean annual reduction of less than 1X of flow. <br />However, the effect of this reduction is more severe during low flows. <br />The one-day low flew •f record (13 years of data) •n the Lower Thompson <br />Creek is 1.5 cfs (9!1!54). Far this extreme, a 21X reduction of flow <br />will be experienced. Insufficient data 1s available to establish the <br />frequency of this event. The average daily year low flow of record is <br />2.36 cfs. For this flow, a 13X reduction would be experienced. This <br />short-lived depletion is not predicted to cause any material damage to <br />the stream. <br />'~ The mine water being discharged at present to North Thompson Creek has <br />ionic characteristics that differ from the natural stream levels. The <br />discharge is predicted to shift the ion balance in North Thompson Creek <br />from its present calcium-bicarbonate type to a calcium-sulfate type. The <br />magnitude of this shift, however, cannot be quantified, since the <br />receiving stream will tend to dilute the effect. Assuming a mean annual <br />low flow of 2.36 cfs and a maximum discharge of 0.3 cfs from the mine <br />(13X of total flow), the dilution ratio would be 8 to 1. 7hfs shows that <br />a near or complete shift to the tan balance, even during low flows, in <br />unlikely. No standards have been set for these ionic changes. However, <br />it is known that sudden changes of high magnitude can affect fish and <br />other aquatic life. In this case, however, no significant changes are <br />anticipated. Past monitoring data at the mine shows only a slight <br />increase 1n sulfate levels downstream from the mine. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.