My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32564
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32564
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:02 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:20:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/12/1990
Doc Name
SENECA II MINE REGRADED SPOIL MONITORING PRGRAM
From
PEABODY COAL CO
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SENECA [I MINE <br />REGRADED SPOIL MONITORING PLAN REVIEW <br />Wolf Creek Mininq and Reclamation Area <br />Peabody has completed an evaluation of the regraded spoil monitoring <br />program that is used to determine spoil suitability in the Wolf Creek <br />reclamation area at Seneca II Mine. The fallowing text summarizes this <br />evaluation and discusses two proposed revisions to the existing plan. <br />Spoil samples have been collected from the Wolf Creek mining and <br />reclamation area since 1984. The data has been evaluated, summarized, and <br />submitted to CMLRD in three annual monitoring reports (1986, 1987, and <br />1988 field seasons) and the response to comments for the Permit Renewal <br />Application (10/14/86). Data from the 1989 field season will be submitted <br />to CMLRD in April 1990 as part of the Fourth Annual Topsoil and Spoil <br />Monitoring Report. Samples have been collected on a 300 foot grid and at <br />representative revegetation monitoring sites. <br />The existing parameter list for sampling regraded spoil in the Wolf Creek <br />reclamation area was based upon the information acquired during the <br />premine overburden assessment. The approved parameter list for Seneca II <br />Mine, described on page 9-40 of Tab 9 and pages 6-153 and 6-164 of Tab 6 <br />in the PAP, includes soil reaction (pH), soil salinity (EC), acid base <br />potential (ABP), and extractable manganese (Mn). <br />A sufficient number of spoil samples have been collected from the 1983 <br />through 1989 reclamation blocks to determine spoil characteristics, <br />compare spoil quality to premine overburden quality, and ascertain the <br />degree of sample variability. The data is summarized and discussed in <br />three separate categories; mixed spoil, selectively handled spoil <br />topdressing, and premine overburden (see Table 1). <br />Salinity. Mean salinity values for the selectively handled spoil <br />topdressing, mixed spoil, and premine overburden are 2.0, 3.3, and 1.9 <br />mmhos/cm, respectively. Salinity values ranged from 0.3 to 3.7 mmhos/cm <br />in the spoil topdressing, from 0.3 to 11.5 mmhos/cm in the mixed spoil, <br />and from 0.1 to 5.9 mmhos/cm in the premine overburden. Mean annual <br />salinity values showed little variation from 1984 ,t~irough 1989 (Table 1). <br />Two salinity values in the mixed spoil wer-e-in_e~cCE$~ance-of• the maximum <br />allowable level of 8.0 mmhos/cm for suitable material (Seneca II Mine PAP, <br />Tab 6, Table 6-3). These two samples were also extremely acidic with pH <br />values of 2.3 and 2.5 and ABP deficiencies of 29 and 48 tons of calcium <br />carbonate per 1000 tons of material. <br />Overall, the salinity levels are low to moderate in the 1983 through 1989 <br />reclamation blocks and should pose no severe problem to successful <br />reclamation. Salinity levels in the upper four feet of regraded spoil <br />are slightly, but not significantly higher than premine values. Only two <br />percent of the total spoil samples had salinity values greater than five <br />mmhos/cm. These three samples also had extremely unsuitable reaction <br />values of 2.3, 2.5, and 3.3. The excess acidity and salinity is <br />attributable to the oxidation of reactable iron sulfide minerals <br />(framboidal and microcrystalline forms of pyrite and marcasite) to sulfate <br />salts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.