My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32491
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32491
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:01 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:19:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/21/1982
Doc Name
ANNUAL EMBANKMENT INSPECTION SENECA II MINE STIPULATION 17 TO PERMIT C-80-005
From
SENECA COALS LTD
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Sandra L. Emrich <br />June 18, 1982 <br />Page 2 <br />D. June 15, 1982: The annual embankment inspection was con- <br />ducted. Weather conditions were favorable, skies partly <br />cloudy, temperature about 65oF. Alight rain had fallen <br />on the evening of June 14th. <br />II. Inspection <br />A. Crest of Embankment <br />The crest of the embankment is a 60-foot wide roadway used <br />for coal haulage. No signs of stress (cracks) were noted <br />upon inspection of the crest. The roadway and side ditches <br />are well maintained. Safety berms are in place. The side <br />ditches are clean and traverse the entire length of the em- <br />bankment with no openings for discharge onto embankment <br />slopes. There was no flow in the side ditches on the date <br />of the inspection. <br />B. Upstream Embankment Slope <br />Vegetation is rather sparse due in part to this being the <br />first growing season after seeding. Erasion does not ap- <br />pear to be a problem due to the limited runoff across the <br />slope. No cracking .or bulging was noted on the slope. <br />The slope was inspected for a debris line that would in- <br />dicate impounding of water. None was found and interviews <br />with mine personnel indicate that no water was impounded <br />during the past year. The stake set to indicate the 10- <br />year, 24-hour storm water elevation is in place. <br />C. Upstream Channel <br />The upstream channel was inspected to a point approximately <br />100 feet upstream of the lowest elevation. No flow was <br />noted in the channel on the day of inspection. No debris <br />line or water line could be found. This indicates that <br />any flows had been transmitted through the structure via <br />the rock fill. A check of the weather records at Hayden, <br />Colorado revealed that the highest 24-hour precipitation <br />for 1981 was 1.06 inches on Piay 3, 1981. This compares <br />with the predicted 10-year, 24-hour event of 1.6 inches. <br />D. Downstream Embankment Slope <br />Vegetation appears somewhat thicker on this slope than on <br />the upstream slope. Erosion does not appear to be a problem <br />due to the relatively short slope and limited area exposed <br />to runoff. No cracking, bulging, or other signs of stress <br />were noted. The area below the first break in slope was <br />being re-topsoiled for reclamation seeding layer this year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.