My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32312
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32312
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:56 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:15:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/16/1989
Doc Name
1988 GRASSY GAP MINE VEGETATION DATA Memo
From
MLRD
To
CATHY BEGEJ
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9. Revegetation success criteria (or species diversity and woody plant density <br />ore not addressed in the application. Since livestock grazing is the proposed <br />primnry post-mining Land use, and given the landowner request, shrub reestab- <br />lishment may not be required. This determination u~il! depend on resolu[ron <br />of the issues noted in Section X111 l4ildli(e of this letter. A proposnl jot <br />evealuatinq species diversity artcl as species diversity standard, as required <br />by Rule 4.I5.8(5) must be included in the applicatron. <br />A species diversity success criterion is proposed based on the Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division's Proposed Policy for Evaluating <br />Species Diversity, as follows: <br />Diversity will be based on cover data. Revegetation will be considered <br />successful if the data demonstrate the presence of at least five peren- <br />nia] species with relative importance of at least 3 percent, with al] <br />of these species combined not exceeding 75 percent relative importance, <br />nor any one of these species exceeding 40 percent relative importance. <br />Criteria for woody plant density and diversity are not proposed at <br />this timc. <br />5. The priman~ seed mix, which includes a number of introduced joroge <br />grasses, including crested wheatgrass, may be appropriate given the land use <br />considerations and iando caner request. A concern expressed in the past with <br />regard to crested wheatgrass is that, when used in a mix with native species <br />it will tend to dominate the stand to the exclusion of other seeded specres. <br />This concern is based primarily on research in the northern great plains, <br />but has not been datum cored in northwestern Colorado. The applicant should <br />commit to a revegetation monitoring program which will document the com- <br />petitive relationship among the various species. <br />W e agree that not enough is knov,n about the behavior of crested <br />wheatgrass when seeded in mixtures with natives. It is fairly well <br />established that since the palatability of crested wheatgrass is io+ver <br />than for many other grass species, grazing tends to favor crested <br />wheatgrass establishment at the expense of more palatable specres <br />which .are grazed more heavily. Proper grazing management can <br />reduce this trend. <br />Virtually all published research on seeding crested wheatgrass in mixtures <br />deals with mixtures in which crested wheatgrass is a maior constituent <br />of the mix. The mixture proposed in the permit apnlication includes <br />crested wheatgrass as a relatively minor constituent. It is included <br />for the following reasons: <br />. It will help stabilize the soil surface and reduce erosion. <br />. It is well adapted to the soils and climate of the area. <br />Tt is a reliable terminator. <br />. lts presence will add to the diversity of the reclaimed <br />stand. <br />. It is nutritious as summer forage. <br />2-G7 ll.,i-~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.