Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Thomas K. Snodgrass, Esq. <br />February 5, 2004 <br />Page 2 <br />the mining site to offset out-of-priority depletions during the irrigation season. The monthly <br />depletions and replacement requirements for this year are found on the attached table. <br />As required by Section 8 of Senate Bill 89-120, this substitute water supply plan has been <br />provided to an outside consultant for review. The consultant has recommended approval of the <br />plan by way of a draft of this letter. Based upon statutory requirements and the recommendations <br />of the consultant, I hereby approve the proposed substitute water supply plan in accordance with <br />Section §37-90-137(11), C.R.S., subject to the following conditions: <br />1. Unless otherwise revoked or modified, this plan shall be valid through December 31, <br />2005. <br />2. If this plan will not be made absolute by a water court action by the plan's expiration <br />date, a renewal request must be submitted to this office with the statutory fee (currently <br />$217) no later than November 16, 2005. <br />3. A well permit must be issued for the gravel pit in accordance with Section §37-90-137(2) <br />and (11), C.R.S prior to the exposure or 4se of groundwater. A well permit application <br />was submitted to this office under receipt no. 516740, and this application is pending <br />evaluation. The provisions of §37-90-137(2) C.R.S. prohibits the issuance of a permit <br />for a well to be located within 600 feet of any existing well, unless the State Engineer <br />finds that circumstances so warrant after a hearing held in accordance with the <br />procedural rules in 2CCR402-5. This hearing may be waived if you are able to obtain <br />statements from the owners of all well within 600 feet, verifying that they have no <br />objection to your use of the proposed well. Should a new well permit be denied for <br />reasons of 600 foot spacing, or any other legitimate reason, approval of this substitute <br />supply plan will be cancelled. <br />4. According to the information submitted, there appears to be 21.5 acres of exposed <br />water surface within the permit boundary that was created by another gravel operator <br />after January 1, 1981. As a result, the depletions associated with the evaporation <br />from the exposed groundwater surface are the responsibility of the operator/land <br />owner if the pit is located within the mining permit boundary. The applicant in this <br />substitute water supply plan will not be held responsible for the depletions associated <br />with the evaporation from this surface area under this plan approval. However, <br />subsequent renewal of this plan will be contingent upon developing a plan to either <br />remove this historic pit from the current permit boundary or provide a replacement <br />source for this depletion. <br />5. The total surface area of the groundwater exposed (including the pit lake, conveyance <br />channels, and the sump area) at the Una Gravel Pit, in addition to the 21.5 acres <br />described above, must not exceed 8.0 acres resulting in a maximum annual evaporative <br />loss from this area of 24.3 acre-feet. <br />6. The annual water used for dust control at the Una Gravel Pit shall not exceed 2.8 acre- <br />feet, the total product mined at the Una Gravel Pit shall not exceed 75,000 tons per year <br />resulting in 2.2 acre-feet of water lost with the mined aggregate and the total water used <br />far concrete production shall nat exceed 2.8 acre-feet. <br /> <br />