GENERAL32217

• Permit No: M1977320
• IBM Index Class Name: General Documents
• From: LARRY & JUDI ADAMS
• To: DEPT OF PLANNING & ZONING
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

•
• III 1111111IIIIIII I
Larry & Judi r.dams
002° Co. r;d. 62
Canon City, CO. 812I2
Deot. of =lanning ~:Loni;ig
61~ ~=icon eve.
Czncn City, Co. dI2I2
Jear Slrs:
qt trls tlme '.':° rare Strom objections to the apolicaticn for the
COndltlOn31 U°e permit,- Clip ~~.-C Su,:~:-:lt Br1Ck ana The Co. ~ 3 i~:xle Clay
~:il:ie. nS CO.+:d. 62 15 c.n eaSe?.2llt aCC r055 !7y property 2nd 1t rnns '„ithin.
~~ feet Of mV hCme and OutbUllding5. JLIe t0 tre lOCatlOn Of my+ tome t0 CO.
~d. 62;in the oast, we have made complaints of re2lth ha_ards to include,
dust and dirt pollution, noise pollution and salty concerns of haa•ay_equip.
en a one lane Co. ~3. to various state and Co. a;~encys. This was in Ico2,
The Co. said they could de nothing, as the Permit :vas already issued.
They suggested v:e cont2et the hauler. ile did ccrtact the hauler a± that time.
.ie tryed to work cut some tyre of solution to the noise pollution (3ue to
heavy trUCkS and j2ice bra'.•_esj, and dirt and dust -ollution (to oil or '.cater
the ro2d as it runs so close to the house.) nut to r.o avail.
IIpon contacting the hauler at that time (loader Construction) cur ideas
•:.ere met with profanity over the phone, 2nd D:r. Loader comming to my hone and
telling me he would not consider •,vater or oil for the road, to keep pollution
dov+n and if I didn't like it I could move.
If Summit Bric'.~ & Tile Co. and the o.veners of the property to be mined
which to my knowledge is the 'B'ingo ?anch, would put in a alternate haul Rd.
and would not use Co. ~d. 62 for the movement of product or heavy equip.
used in mining, I would have no objection to the permit.