My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32200
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32200
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:53 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:13:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982121
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/22/1994
Doc Name
STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR APPEAL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />In the present situation, the acts of the BLM in prohibiting <br />sale of the lawfully mined locatable product, either screened or <br />stockpiled, and thereafter to confiscate it, for disposition to <br />other parties for a non-qualifying use by with removal from the <br />quarry permitted to MCR/Pitkin is patently wrong, violative of the <br />mining laws, and confiscatory. <br />Furthermore, the BLM is required to adhere to permit <br />conditions from the State of Colorado, which were approved by BLM, <br />and which would require any operator or any other person entering <br />upon the premises and removing limestone therefrom to obtain a <br />valid permit from the State, which could not be done in the absence <br />of termination of the existing permit. <br />3.3 The Community Pit. <br />' The Multiple Surface Use Act of 1955 (the "Common Varieties <br />Act") provides in part: <br />"NO deposit of common varieties of sand, stone, gravel, <br />pumice, pumicite, or cinders shall be deemed a valuable <br />mineral deposit within the meaning of the mining laws of the <br />United States so as to give effective validity to 'any mining <br />of claim hereafter located under such laws; provided, however, <br />that nothing herein shall affect the validity of any mining <br />location based upon discovery of some other mineral occurring <br />in or in association with such a deposit. 'Common Varieties' <br />as used in this Act does not include deposits of such <br />43 CFR 3601.1 provides: <br />"mineral materials disposals may not be made under the Act <br />from public lands on which: (c) there are valid <br />unpatented mining claims located on or after July 23, 1955 for <br />valuable minerals that are not 'common variety' occurring in, <br />or associated with 'common variety' minerals." <br />The attempted establishment of the Community Pit was not based <br />upon a "deposit" of mineral materials, but rather upon stockpiles <br />of previously extracted valuable minerals that are not a common <br />variety. <br />Clearly the "Stockpile" is not a "deposit" which would involve <br />extraction or mining from a claim, as contrasted with loading out <br />of stockpiles. <br />In the absence of Common Variety minerals available in the <br />"Community Pit" for mining or extraction additional to the <br />locatable valuable minerals, the attempted establishment of the <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.