My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32130
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:52 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:12:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/23/1982
Doc Name
Approved Decision Document For Fed Lease C-0125439
From
OSM
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
*~ , <br />;.. <br />2 <br />The effects of simultaneous mine operations in '?cClane canyon <br />and 'iunger Canyon on wintering deer or other wildlife cannot <br />be accurately predicted. Procedures outlined in the Protective- - <br />Measures, Resource 'tonitoring and Reclamation sections of both <br />application wildlife plans,. reflect basically sound principles <br />and goals. We believe that close coordination with the Division <br />of Wildlife, the Bureau of Land Management and the Fish and Wildlife <br />Service will aid in implementation of adequate wildlife programs <br />and will help minimize chances for unexpected conflicts•.. Soecifl- <br />ca11y, we would like to recommend: <br />That contingency options for habitat mitigation or en= -- '----- <br />hancement be developed in cooperation with the DOW and- -- <br />BLM in the even! that wildlife impacts result or are <br />greater than anticipated. <br />2. That Impact monitoring efforts be coordinated through <br />nOW to insure comparability with existing procedures. <br />3. That future rantor surveys be reviewed for adequacy by <br />DOW and FWS. ~,le would be willing to assist in develop- <br />ment of a rantor survey program. <br />~• <br />We would like to make one final observation. In reviewing the <br />'lunger Lanyon and '?cClane Canyon mine plans, we have noted very <br />little discussion of their plans for coal transportation. It <br />appears that Sheridan Enterprises consideration for wildllfe <br />impacts ends at the mine permit boundary. tJe are. indeed, very <br />concerned about coal haulage impacts to wildlife. He are nartlcular- <br />ly troubled by Sheridan Enterprises' failure to clarify their <br />Intentions in regard to a rail transport system (s?e attached <br />June 18, 1981 memo to BLM). The fact that they are even considering <br />this option could be extracted from only one casual statement <br />in the wildlife portion of the "icClane Canyon permit application. <br />lJhile we believe that a rail system may, in the long run, be <br />a desirable means of coal transportation, construction of a rail <br />corridor opens many more questions about impacts to wildlife. <br />Important riparian areas that are occupied by high federal interest <br />birds may be potentially threatened. - <br />If you have any questions on these comments, please feel free <br />to give me a call. <br />SincLer~ly, <br />r U <br />Ronel Finley <br />cc: Bill Clark, D047, brand Junction, CO <br />Doug "kYPan, 5L?1, rrand Junction, CO <br />Tom Lytle, DO:J, ,rand Junction, Cfl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.