Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br />5. OSM's issuance of <br />Mineral Leasing Act portion of <br />' ante with the National Historic <br />• (36 CFR 800) (see TA and State <br />[2.07.6(2)(e), 786.19(e)]. <br />a permit and the Secretarial decision on the <br />the mining and reclamation plan are in compli- <br />Preservation Act and implementing regulations <br />Historic Preservation Officer correspondence) <br />6. The applicant has the legal right to enter and conduct underground <br />mining activities in the permit area. This is verified by documents located <br />in the Mining & Reclamation Plan (MRP). Appendix C [786.19(f)]. <br />7. The applicant has submitted proof showing that prior violations of <br />applicable law and regulations have been corrected. A call to Bryan Munson of <br />the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division on 6/25/82 confirmed this. This <br />has been thoroughly discussed in appenix B of the MRP. (2.01.6(2)(9), [786.19- <br />(9)J]) <br />8. The applicant has submitted proof that all fees for the Abandoned <br />Mine Reclamation Fund have been paid [2.07.6(2)(0), 786.19(h)] (See Reclama- <br />tion Fees, pg. 28, Sec. XXIV of TA.) (Confirmed by OSM staff in discussion <br />with the John Sender, Fee Compliance Officer in the New Mexico State Office, <br />3/30/82.) <br />9. The applicant does not control and has not controlled mining opera- <br />tions with a demonstrated pattern of willful violations of the Act of such na- <br />ture, duration, and with such resulting irreparable damage to the environment <br />as to indicate an intent not to comply with the provisions of the Act <br />(pg. 28, Sec. XXVI, of the TA) [2.07.6(2)(h), 786.19(1)]. <br />10. Surface coal mining and reclamation operations to be performed under <br />• the permit will not be inconsistent with other operations in areas adjacent to <br />the proposed permit area since the Munger Canyon Mine, also owned by Salt <br />Creek Minig, is located immediately south of McClave about 1 1/2 miles. (see <br />Land Use, Appendix K of MRP) and (page 28, Sec. XXV of TA), [2.07.6(2)(1), <br />786.19(j)] <br />11. The analysis completed by OSM shows that the bond amount will be ad- <br />equate. The applicant is required to submit the performance bond required <br />under the Act, the approved State program, and the Federal Lands Program prior <br />to permit issuance. The bond would be made payable to both the United States <br />and the State of Colorado in the amount of $53,750.00 [2.07.6(2)(j), 786.19 (k) <br />and 742.12(b)] (See Bonding Sec. XIX, page 27 of TA). <br />12. The applicant has obtained a negative declaration with respect to <br />prime farmlands (See Prime Farmlands, Appendix L of MRP and Sec. XIV, page 25 <br />of TA) [2.07.6(2)(k), 786.19(1)]. <br />13. With respect to the life of mine permit area, a positive alluvial <br />valley floor determination has been made. An area of the East Salt Creek AVF <br />is contained within the mining permit area (Approximately 1/6 of one percent <br />of the AVF contained in the permit area will be affected, or about .24 <br />acres). The area, which is disturbed by the access road to the mine, was pre- <br />viously disturbed by a ranch road. The only agriculture in the affected area <br />is open livestock grazing and by careful analysis, it was concluded the small <br />amount of disturbance mentioned above will not directly affect other types of <br />fanning located downstream. There will be no water runoff from the mine work- <br />• ings since the coal seams dip inward and away from the creek. The workings <br />are essentially dry which is normally the case with Mesa Verde Cameo Seam <br />mines located above ~,vater table. Furthermore, all surface water runo~f <br />