My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32059
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:50 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:10:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981053
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/29/2004
Doc Name
Hydrology Impact Assessment
From
Tom Kaldenbach
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that the Blue Flame site is not contributing more suspended solids to offsite streamflow or runoff <br />than premining conditions. <br />Evaluation of Hydroloaic Impacts Required by Section 3.03.2(2) <br />Rule 3.03.2(2) requires the Division to evaluate hydrologic impacts prior to releasing reclamation <br />liability. This evaluation must consider whether pollution of surface or subsurface water is <br />occurring, and the probability of future occurrence of such pollution. The Division's evaluation is <br />summarized below. <br />Cround Water Impacts - As shown in Figure 1, the underground workings of the Blue Flame <br />Mine aze above the current ground water saturated zone. The elevation of the top of the saturated <br />zone is considered to be stabilized at its approximate current position. Only a significant long- <br />term change in regional climate would significantly raise or lower this elevation. Over time, <br />meteoric water probably infiltrates from the land surface down into the abandoned underground <br />workings of the Blue Flame Mine. As this water accumulates in the workings, it would seep into <br />the bedrock walls of the workings, and migrate downgradient to the saturated zone. The <br />expected migration direction would be generally southward from the workings. Any minerals this <br />migrating water has picked up in the mine workings would be carried to the saturated zone. If <br />the mineral content of this migrating water is high, then it could pollute the ground water in the <br />saturated zone. The infiltration and migration process would take several decades owing to the <br />low hydraulic conductivity of the Cliff House Sandstone and Menefee Formation. It is <br />improbable that any water from the Blue Flame workings has reached the saturated zone, yet. <br />Also, it is improbable that the Blue Flame workings have discharged water to the land surface in <br />the portal area because it would take many decades to fill the workings up to the portal area. No <br />seepage or discharge from the portal area has been found during the Division's regulaz <br />inspections. The improbability of current degradation to the saturated zone, and the absence of <br />discharges from the portal, indicate the Blue Flame Mine is not causing ground water pollution, <br />and the operation is in compliance with the Basic Standards for Ground Water (Colorado Water <br />Quality Control Regulation 41.S.C.6). <br />Surface Water Impacts -The only surface water feature that would receive surface runoff from the <br />Blue Flame surface disturbance is Hay Gulch. The Gulch does not have a stream channel An <br />irrigation ditch flows through the bottom of the Gulch. The only surface water from the Blue Flame <br />surface disturbance that would reach Hay Gulch is surface runoff from rain or snowmelt. (As <br />previously discussed, a discharge from the portal area has not occurred.) The volume ofrunofffrom <br />the disturbed azea is small because this area covers only 4.1 acres. Surface runofffrom the disturbed <br />area can be expected to be alkaline and free of contaminants as there are no leachate-forming <br />materials on the land surface. The quality of this runoff should be closely similar to runoff from <br />surrounding undisturbed lands, and therefore, does not have the potential to degrade surface waters <br />or alluvial water in Hay Gulch. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.