My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32022
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:49 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:09:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983194
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
COVER SHEET-2 PUBLIC COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIS & RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Response No. 79. BLM is in complete agrcement for <br />the need to develop a hydrologic model to evaluate salt <br />loading, transport, and expected impacts from mining <br />operations. However, BLM has used the best available <br />information to determine possible impacts to the hydrologic <br />system at this time. <br />Water Resources/Geology/Rock Mechanics <br />Response No. 80. The solution cavity wiB open slowly <br />with the rate of dissolution of the nahcoGte. The rate of <br />caving will be proportional to the strength of ground, the <br />size of opening, and the rate at which the openiug ti made. <br />The loading to the strata overlying Use solution cavity will <br />take place slowly, As loading increases, sagging will occw <br />in this strata, and some delamination of the strata <br />immediately over the ravines would be expected. The <br />thermal effect of the process waters on Ute structural integrity <br />of the overlying strata to the solution cavities is within the <br />limitation factors established for the caving of these beds. <br />Over long periods of time, additional svesses may cause <br />further caving. These svesses, on the character of beds, would <br />cause caving at slow rates, With caviug, turbulence within <br />the immediate aquifer could be induced and porosity would <br />increase, but Ute flow of the aquifer would not necessarily <br />increase. <br />The rate of leaching due to cavity collapse is very difficult <br />to predin and is dependent on the movement of water <br />through the lower aquifer. With cavity collapse, dissolution <br />would probably increase; however, the groundwater system <br />will be monitored to see if there are any impacts. <br />Groundwater degradation and saline zone leaching retes <br />were estimated from all available data and were presented <br />in the EIS to give the reader an approximation of levels <br />at which impacts were expected to occur. Other government <br />agencies were consulted for comments and for interpretation <br />of analysis for subsidence and leaching. <br />As stated on page 45 of the draft, Section 4.2.2.2, second <br />column, first paragraph, rapid roof collapse is not exported. <br />Therefore, rapid leaching is not expected either. However, <br />extensive monitoring will be implemented to verify the <br />predictions made in ow analysis. <br />Only with development of the solution ravines in actual <br />field conditions can all factors controlling ground stability <br />be determined and verified. At the same time, monitoring <br />of the aquifers will be required to detect and quantify impacts. <br />If the impacts are significant, remedial actions will be taken. <br />The premise of the environmental impact statement is <br />the conservation of resowces, both mineral and environ- <br />mental. The solution mining of the nahcolite within the <br />Boles Bed presents virtually no risk to the futwe minebiliry <br />of the oil shale. The minable oil shale would remain virtually <br />intact, as it is today, and any additional commingling of <br />the aquifers, than exists today, would not be inherent. The <br />monitoring and mitigation developed in this document wiB <br />accomplish this goal. <br />Water Resources/Rock Mechanics <br />Response No. 81. The roof span and the pillar width <br />could be altered m mitigate any unexpected caving of the <br />cavity. <br />Response No. 82. Although plan views and cross <br />sectional fllusvations would be another piece of data, BLM <br />believes that the text describes the cavities and groundwater <br />Bow patterns precisely and in sufficient detail for an E[S <br />document. This is not a technical report. <br />Well Completion/Operation/Abandonment <br />Response No. 83. Please refer to Appendix B for BLM's <br />technical evaluation of WRC's proposed well completion <br />end abandonment procedwes. <br />Response No. 84. Since maximum utility from the <br />minimum allowable cement job is dewed for this project, <br />a comprehensive evaluation of the cement must occur. [f <br />necessary, remedial cementing procedures wilt be designed <br />end executed to enswe adequate cavity isolation and a stable <br />well bore environment for nabcolite exvaction, The Cement <br />Evaluation Tool log or equivalent will provide the data <br />needed to fully evaluate the cement job. A Cement Bond <br />Log, which does not provide the necessary data, is subject <br />to well bore effects and is difficult to interpret. <br />The temperature log does not provide the accuracy <br />necessary to determine the exact cement top or any <br />information to determine cement bonding. Please refer to <br />Appendix B for further clarification on cement bonding <br />concerns. <br />Response No. 85. No change. <br />Oceurtences of gas above the Saline Zone are documented. <br />The potential for gas to accumulate within the voids left <br />across the Mahogany Zone exists. There is also the possibility <br />of water flow through voids across the Mahogany Zone <br />that are opened during mining operations. Placement of a <br />cement plug across the Mahogany Zone will maintain its <br />function as a semiconfining layer to provide isolation of <br />the upper and lower aquifer, and will also protect i[ for <br />future recovery of the nth oil shale resource. <br />Response No. 86. ThissectianexplainsWRC'sproposed <br />well completion program. Refer to Appendix C for the <br />mitigating measures that will be applied to the approved <br />action, regardless of the alternative. <br />2-50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.