My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31888
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31888
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:45 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:07:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS STATE OF COLO DOCKET # 27512
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />28. James R. "Bill" Hyde, Senior Property Tax Specialist for <br />the Division of Property Taxation, testified about the declaration <br />form used by the assessors and the procedures in the Assessor's <br />Reference Library. <br />29. Mr. Hyde confirmed that there were no specific <br />definitions of the terms used on the declaration. He stated that <br />he believed that everyone affected had a common understanding as to <br />what the terms meant, and that industry representatives, the <br />public, and assessors all had an opportunity to have input when the <br />forms come before the Statutory Advisory Committee for approval. <br />When asked hie understanding of the teen "recoverable reserves," he <br />indicated those which lie within the life of mine boundary. If the <br />boundary changes, then the reported reserves would change. <br />30. Mr. Hyde also confirmed the procedures concerning <br />determination of economic life as stated in the Assessor's <br />Reference Library, and testified as to how the various published <br />factors and prices were determined. Although the statute requires <br />that non-producing interests be valued "as all other property," Mr. <br />Hyde stated that there were no sales of coal mines for the market <br />approach and since the interests were in land, the cost approach <br />was inappropriate. Therefore, the procedure developed by the <br />Division, which is based on the income approach, is the only method <br />available to the assessor. <br />31, On cross examination, Mr. Hyde was asked what activities <br />were allowed within the life of mine boundary but outside the <br />current permitted active mining area. He said he believed that <br />only those activities that had been permitted when the life of mine <br />boundary was established, which were typically monitoring <br />activities. <br />32. Respondent's witness Kent Gorum, environmental protection <br />specialist with the Colorado Division of Mines and Minerals, <br />testified as to the currently permitted area, statue of permit, <br />procedures for revision and renewal, and data on the Wolf Creek <br />seam. It is his testimony which was the subject of the stipulation <br />about confidential information. <br />33. Mr. Gorum has been the person in charge of the permits <br />for the subject mine for the past 3 years. He testified that the <br />currently permitted area contains approximately 14,611 acres. The <br />5 year permitting process runs for 5 years regardless of major and <br />minor revisions of the life of mine boundary, or number of <br />technical revisions. There is a full review of the mine and permit <br />halfway through the term, and the mine has the right of successive <br />renewal as long as they apply within 180 days of the end of the <br />term. He was unable to give the termination date of the 5 year <br />permit in effect. <br />UA/A27512 <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.