My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-01-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
1996-01-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2021 8:20:49 AM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:04:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/26/1996
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR6
From
Apache Rocks Lease
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
percent changes in North Fork flow volumes due to withdrawals for <br /> projected mine requirements. <br /> The NPDES permit allows for a discharge of 10,000 gpd, based on a <br /> 30-day average, from the sanitary waste water treatment plant. The <br /> potential impact of discharge of waste water effluent would be greatest <br /> when the dilution ratio for effluent is smallest. <br /> Total mine water inflow in the F Seam is estimated to not have <br /> exceeded 15 acre-feet in any one year. The quality of mine water is <br /> considered good and offers no problem for treatment and discharge. <br /> Mine water discharge is treated in sedimentation pond MB-1. B Seam <br /> inflow amounts are expected to be similar to the mine water inflow <br /> amounts of the F Seam. <br /> Overland runoff passes over disturbed areas within the permit area to <br /> one of the five sedimentation ponds, mentioned previously in this <br /> section. This water may be discharged to the North Fork or stored <br /> when water rights are in priority. From previous Annual Hydrology <br /> Reports, it appears that these discharges have had no adverse effect on <br /> the North Fork. In fact, the quality of the discharge usually exceeds <br /> the quality of the North Fork. <br /> i. Refuse Material Disposal Impacts on Surface Water - <br /> Lower Refuse Disposal Area - Runoff from the Lower <br /> Permanent Waste Disposal site will be routed through the <br /> sediment control system and must meet effluent limitations. <br /> Final designs for the waste rock pile, which include surface <br /> and subsurface drainage systems, allow for the collection of <br /> water leachate from the pile. Analysis of sample rock <br /> provided by MCC indicates that potential toxicity levels are <br /> below the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards. <br /> Consequently, it appears that if runoff were to develop from <br /> the waste piles, minimal impact will occur on the North Fork <br /> of the Gunnison River. MCC will be monitoring for both <br /> ground water quality and levels under the piles, leachate <br /> quality and levels from the subdrains, and spring quality from <br /> the base of the pile site. MCC has had leach tests performed <br /> on representative samples of waste rock. Of analyses <br /> conducted at three labs, the leachate exceeded drinking water <br /> standards in four parameters. One lab reported dissolved iron <br /> concentrations of 6.62 mg/I (secondary drinking water <br /> standards = .3 mg/1); the other labs reported iron at .05 mg/1 <br /> and .06 mg/l. Two labs reported pH's of 8.9 and 9.1 <br /> (secondary drinking water standards = 6.5 - 8.5 pH). <br /> Selenium exceeded standards at two labs which were .04 mg/1 <br /> and .025 mg/1 (primary drinking water standards = .01 mg/1). <br /> 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.