Laserfiche WebLink
o <br /> The operator at the West Elk Mine expects that mine inflows will <br /> increase at a rate slower than the McWhorter model predicted for <br /> advancing mine workings. Most of the inflow has occurred along the <br /> subcrop in the same location each year. The inflow is seasonal and <br /> varies with the magnitude of seasonal precipitation. Inflow to the <br /> advancing mine workings has been minimal and unmeasurable. The <br /> experience near the F Seam subcrop indicates that the colluvium, coal <br /> and bedrock are recharged locally. <br /> In the past, the West Elk Mine has experienced three types of mine <br /> inflows. The first type of inflow is due to primary permeability which <br /> is ground water flow through the competent portions of the F Seam <br /> and lower Barren member. The second type of inflow occurs in the <br /> coal seam and overlying Barren member in areas of shallow <br /> overburden. This is secondary permeability and is the result of <br /> ground water flow through the fractured and weathered portions of <br /> these strata. The fractured rock acts as a conduit to the surface <br /> colluvial aquifers. The third type of inflow is also due to secondary <br /> permeability and it is the result of ground water flow along fault <br /> zones. These fault zones may be in contact with surface aquifers or <br /> with water bearing zones in the overburden. The streams in the North <br /> Fork area are generally fault controlled and may be a source of <br /> recharge for fault related inflows. Prior to the construction of the <br /> mine entries, piezometers were installed in the colluvial/landslide <br /> strata immediately upslope of the entries. All piezometers but one <br /> were destroyed during construction of the entries. <br /> Three of the five entries experienced inflows during construction, <br /> which began in September of 1981. Adit entry No. 4 experienced the <br /> greatest inflow, about 5 gpm, which decreased to less than 1 gpm and <br /> dried up within a week. The No. 1 entry produced a small quantity of <br /> water from the bottom of the coal at a rate of less than 1 gpm and <br /> dried up within two weeks. However, the sandstone roof at entry <br /> No. 1 was dry. Entry No. 5 produced drips, approximately 0.1 gpm, <br /> for about one week. The other two entries were dry. During the <br /> period from August to December 1981 water levels dropped in some <br /> of the piezometers located above the portals. In all cases the drop <br /> was not greater than two feet. Water levels have changed very little <br /> since January 1982. <br /> MCC has submitted two plans for the sealing of the portals upon <br /> closure of the mine. The first plan calls for sealing the portals to <br /> allow gravity discharge of mine inflows. MCC anticipated, from <br /> water samples taken in the Oliver Mine, that mine waters will not be <br /> toxic. This plan calls for the construction of a block wall at the portal <br /> and a four-inch PVC pipe to drain the collected mine waters. The <br /> second plan is contingent on the mine producing toxic mine waters. <br /> 29 <br />