Laserfiche WebLink
-zs- <br />4) The Division's experience with underground mines in the Carbondale, <br />Book Cliffs, Danforth Hills, and Yampa Coal Fields of the State, as well as in <br />the Canon City area, indicates that mine inflows are not normally significant <br />when ephemeral streams are undermined. Most of the streams to be undermined <br />in the Canon City area are ephemeral and would not be expected to be <br />significantly affected by mining. Flows in these ephemeral streams are <br />concentrated in periods of snowmelt and high intensity precipitation events. <br />The stream gradients are steep and their channels contain little alluvium. <br />For the above reasons, very little surface water is retained long enough in <br />the stream valleys to infiltrate into the ground water system. Therefore, the <br />amount of water observed reaching the mine workings is insignificant. <br />Perennial streams, however, may experience depletions of flow if mine workings <br />are extended adjacent to and/or below the level of the stream valley (e.g., <br />the bedrock alluvial contact). The lower stream gradient and the thicker <br />alluvial deposits in perenniai stream valleys favor flow retention and <br />recharge to the ground water systems. Due to the increased flow retention and <br />ground water recharge in perenniai stream valleys, there is a greater <br />potential for stream depletions by mining adjacent to or under these stream <br />valleys. Amine in these areas could generate depletions by increasing mine <br />inflows in the area. These mine inflows could be induced either through the <br />mine workings encountering existing faults or fractures, or strata recharged <br />by the stream, or through the mine producing subsidence fractures which extend <br />to the stream valley bottom or to rock strata recharged by the stream. <br />Only one mining operation, Dorchester No. 1, will undermine a perennial <br />drainage, Newlin Creek. The quantity of flow may be depleted in Newlin Creek <br />through the dewatering of subsidence induced faults or fractures and rock <br />strata which are in direct or in indirect communication with the alluvium or <br />stream bottom. The Division is currently reviewing the Dorchester No. 1 Nine <br />permit application for compliance, and does not anticipate a significant <br />impact to the hydrologic balance of Newlin Creek. <br />In summary, it is unlikely that the current and proposed mining activities <br />will significantly impact the natural Hydrologic balance beyond background <br />levels produced by previous mining activities. <br />C. Findings <br />Pursuant to Rule 2.01.6(2)(c), the Division finds that, according to the <br />information presented in the application and with the acceptance of <br />stipulations contained in this document the proposed Twin Pines No. 2 mining <br />operation has been designed to prevent material damage to the hydrologic <br />balance outside the proposed permit area. <br />IX. <br />A <br />21(h <br />Climatological information is presented on Pages JFSA 59 through 64 and pages <br />49-52 of the permit application. <br />