Laserfiche WebLink
-24- <br />1) When underground mine workings encounter saturated portions of the <br />coal seams, water will accumulate requiring water to be pumped from the mine. <br />The removal of this water will lower piezometric surfaces in the coal seams <br />and immediately adjacent strata. The distance from the mine that this impact <br />will extend is dependent upon the transmissivity and storage coefficient <br />properties of the strata. In most coal-bearing strata, these properties are <br />such that the impact rarely extends more than a mile from the edge of the mine <br />workings. <br />The two mines where this phenomena will occur are the Twin Pines No. 2 Mine <br />and the Dorchester No. 1 Mine. As was previously discussed in the probable <br />hydrologic consequences section of this document, the Caldirola Mine well is <br />within one mile of the proposed Twin Pines No. 2 Mine. Although, the <br />piezometric surface may be lowered in the western portion of the abandoned <br />Caldirola Mine, the piezometric surface in the eastern portion of the mine <br />will not be affected. Thus, the quantity of water available for emergency <br />purposes for the town of Coal Creek from the eastern portion of the mine will <br />not be affected. <br />In the Dorchester No. 1 i4ine permit application currently under review by the <br />Division, two wells are described that could be impacted by the lowering of <br />the piezometric surface. Monitoring wells will be constructed between the ~ <br />mining activities and the two wells to detect changes in the piezometric ~ <br />surface. This monitoring should be sufficient to minimize impacts to these <br />wells. <br />2) No subsidence-induced inflows are predicted for the Twin Pines No. 2 <br />Mine nor the Newlin Creek Mine. However, subsidence-induced inflows are <br />anticipated at the Dorchester No. 1 Mine, resulting from mining beneath Newlin <br />Creek, a perennial stream. Because this water feature is within the <br />subsidence zone, the Division, during its review of the Dorchester permit, is <br />emphasizing control and prediction of subsidence. The significance of <br />subsidence of this drainage is limited because the entire flow of the stream <br />is diverted into the Florence City pipeline upstream of the mining operation. <br />Therefore, prediction of the impact to the prevailing hydrologic balance <br />hinges on the functioning of the Florence pipeline. The Division assumes, for <br />the purposes of this report, that the cumulative hydrologic impact of <br />subsidence-induced inflows will be negligible. <br />3) The only mines that may affect the quality of ground water in the <br />general area are the Twin Pines No. 2 t4ine and the Dorchester No. 1 Mine. <br />Potential impacts to ground water quality by those operations are considered <br />negligible as discussed below. <br />