My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31521
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31521
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:37 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:01:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/18/1983
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-15- <br />No information has been provided concerning the significance of the <br />alluvial valley floor to farming. Therefore, the Division must proceed <br />by assuming that the Fish Creek alluvia] valley floor is significant to <br />fanning and by making all three alluvial valley floor findings. <br />1) The proposed mining operations would not interrupt, discontinue, or <br />preclude fanning on the alluvial valley floor, because no mining <br />activities would take place within or beneath the alluvial valley floor <br />itself. <br />2) The proposed mining operations would not cause material damage to the <br />quantity and quality of surface and ground water that supply the alluvial <br />valley floor. <br />Surface flows from the area undermined by the mining operation would not <br />be affected. The underground workings would intercept some of the ground <br />water currently discharging to the stream/alluvial aquifer system. The <br />applicant has estimated that the mine would intercept 98 acre-feet/year <br />of the water currently discharging to the stream/alluvial aquifer <br />system. This represents a continuous discharge of 0.14 cfs that would be <br />intercepted by the mine. Fish Creek is a perennial stream with a base <br />flaw rate of 3 cfs (p. 2.04-20). Discharge in the alluvial aquifer would <br />add to this stream flow. A loss of 0.14 cfs from the stream/alluvial <br />aquifer system would not cause material damage to quantity of water that <br />supplies the AVF. <br />Following mining and reclamation, the mine workings would fill with <br />ground water and water passing through the mine workings would again <br />discharge to the stream/alluvial aquifer system. This water would be <br />expected to have a deyraded water quality (3200 mg/1 TDS at the source), <br />but concentrations would decrease as the affected water flows to the <br />discharge area. The ground water discharge would be further diluted by <br />flow in the stream/alluvial aquifer system. Because of the low flows <br />involved (U. 14 cfs), water quality degradation in the stream/alluvial <br />aquifer system would not be sufficient to cause material damage to the <br />waters which supply the alluvial valley floor. <br />3) The proposed operation would preserve, throughout the mining <br />operation, the essential hydrologic functions of the alluvial valley <br />floor. The essential hydrologic functions of the Fish Creek alluvial <br />valley floor have been identified as the capacity to support subirrigated <br />and flood-irrigated agricultural activities. Since no mining activities <br />would occur within or beneath the alluvial valley floor and since no <br />significant change would occur in the surface and ground water that <br />supply the alluvial valley floor, the essential hydrologic functions of <br />the alluvial valley floor would not be affected by the proposed <br />operations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.