My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31475
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31475
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:36 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:01:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/2/1993
Doc Name
COLOWYO COAL MINE SECTION 16 FILL RESPONSE LETTER PN C-81-019
From
DMG
To
STEVE WATHEN
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Nalu ral Resources <br />1313 Shermdr Si., Room 215 <br />Denver, CQ 90203 <br />Phone. 130 31 860-7 567 <br />FAX.130318i'_-8106 <br />DATE: April 2, 1993 ~ <br />.\ <br />TO: Steve Wathen „~ t r'~--~- <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />oe cow <br />-&; b <br />M a o <br />.rj . <br />. ~~~ <br />18Tfi <br />Roy Romer <br />Gosernor <br />Michael B. Long <br />D~. ision Director <br />RE: Colowyo Co~, Mine - "Section 16 Fill" Response Letter <br />ermit No: C-81-019) <br />I have finally gotten enough of a respit from the Summitville <br />Fiasco to review Colowyo's response to my November 6, 1992 comment <br />letter, dated November 13, 1992. <br />Colowyo's response, prepared by Jim Kilter and Robert Trumbly, P.E. <br />appropriately rspond to my early concerns. They have appropriately <br />described their logic in field location and design of the <br />underdrain in the toe area of the Section 16 Fill. My preliminary <br />examination of Colowyo's January 22, 1993 inspection report for the <br />Section 16 Fill, ascertained that the appropriate design <br />documentation and photographic evidence is provided for the <br />underdrain construction. <br />Therefore, while its relatively mute at this late date, I recommend <br />acceptance of the November 13, 1992 supplemental submittal for the <br />Section 16 Fill adequacy response. It appears that the underdrain <br />beneath the toe area of the fill has been properly constructed and <br />certified. <br />cc: Larry Router <br />JP/7P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.