Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~. <br />y `;T, ,•~ r t ~~~ ,, S _~ is t o y lJJiq ~ t l t 4} 4 i 66 LLB i~~~.~i <br />t l~A~l`, ii Ce ~1 ~1~4 <br />~ I~ <br />~~lb] ~ ~ Y .~A,t r~}~~•,ri. ~til~rE~i1 t r"~~~~~'.~ <br />)a~` ,~f t ak t 1 tt fir, ~ ~tPj{~,~ ati ~~ <br />I'hc wmplr dat;+cullrcreJ from the rcclaimeJ urea arr presenteJ in I;+hlca I through <br />3 bcluu. 1L'hilc the corer stanJarJ alas not ;+chie~rJ in _'UUZ. the hip ision believes <br />that the signitir:u+t rrgiunal Jruught ut' 20U_ resultrd in the poor rover values. <br />Reergetatiun success in al I categoric, in 200 ±. nnJ the outstanding ccecuuiun at the <br />vile oh>cnexi During the final inspection. dcnuunlrate that the site i~ capable ol~self= <br />rrgrnrration :+nJ rcruvcn. even when t:+ecd with adverse drought ronJitiuns anJ <br />rnntinurJ gruing. <br />Table 1 <br />~~lc.rn IIL l' rtr~ cr <br />12rclaimc~l :u•ca ~crsu~ technical standard <br />